2008
DOI: 10.1139/f08-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) abundance and growth among river reaches in a large regulated river

Abstract: Lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) stocks are well below historical levels across their natural range. In this study, we examine why lake sturgeon have not substantially recovered to historical levels in a large regulated river (Ottawa River, Canada). Three primary anthropogenic stressors have been identified as potentially limiting lake sturgeon populations in the Ottawa River: (i) commercial harvest, (ii) contaminants, and (iii) water power management. Hypotheses i and iii were tested by comparing lake stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dams act as barriers to upstream move ment to historic spawning areas (Bir stein 1993, DeVore et al 1995, Wei et al 1997, congregating migrating sturgeon and exposing them to harvest and the perils of poaching (Cohen 1997, Fernández-Pasquier 1999, and altering flows, affecting the success of natural sturgeon recruitment within rivers (Khoroshko 1972, Ivanov et al 1999, Jager et al 2002, Goto et al 2015, Haxton et al 2015. Moreover, variation in sturgeon abundance across the landscape has been attributed to the presence of hydroelectric generating stations (DeVore et al 1995, Haxton & Findlay 2008, Haxton et al 2014, demonstrating that dams can play a significant role in limiting the recovery processes for sturgeon.…”
Section: Recent Improvements and Continued Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dams act as barriers to upstream move ment to historic spawning areas (Bir stein 1993, DeVore et al 1995, Wei et al 1997, congregating migrating sturgeon and exposing them to harvest and the perils of poaching (Cohen 1997, Fernández-Pasquier 1999, and altering flows, affecting the success of natural sturgeon recruitment within rivers (Khoroshko 1972, Ivanov et al 1999, Jager et al 2002, Goto et al 2015, Haxton et al 2015. Moreover, variation in sturgeon abundance across the landscape has been attributed to the presence of hydroelectric generating stations (DeVore et al 1995, Haxton & Findlay 2008, Haxton et al 2014, demonstrating that dams can play a significant role in limiting the recovery processes for sturgeon.…”
Section: Recent Improvements and Continued Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current abundance has been much reduced from historical levels, and the species is considered imperiled in many areas and vulnerable overall (Jelks et al, 2008). Population declines have been caused primarily by overfishing, pollution, and dams that modified habitats and blocked migrations (Scott and Crossman, 1973;Becker, 1983;Ferguson and Duckworth, 1997;Haxton and Findlay, 2008). Over the past 50 years there have been major efforts to restore Lake Sturgeon populations, involving strict fishery regulations and closures, stocking of juveniles, pollution abatement, habitat restoration, modification of hydroelectric dam operation, and provision of fish passage through barrier dams (Auer, 1996a;Schram et al, 1999;Lyons et al, 2000;Johnson et al, 2006;Drauch and Rhodes, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragmentation of rivers by hydroelectric and water control dams is a major contemporary obstacle inhibiting lake sturgeon recovery (Haxton 2006;Hay-Chmielewski and Whelan 1997;Haxton and Findlay 2008). Despite restrictive harvest controls since the early 1900s, improvements in water quality, and pollution control, sturgeon populations have not recovered significantly across their range (COSEWIC 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%