2010
DOI: 10.1017/s002531540999155x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in harbour seal counts obtained using aerial surveys

Abstract: Aerial surveys of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) are usually carried out to provide an index of population size. This can be normalized, either by design or by post-hoc analysis to reduce the effects that date, time of day, tide and weather might have on the number of seals counted. In order for long-term trends to be determined from these counts it is assumed that the mean number of seals at a particular site does not vary during the survey period, and that the start and duration of the survey window does not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sightings in the water peaked during the flood tide (when the current flowed northwards) around 1–2 h before high tide and were at a minimum during the ebb (southward) tide around 1–2 h before low tide; conversely, numbers of seals that were hauled out peaked during the ebb tide and were at a minimum during the flood tide. These results support preliminary surveys in this area which observed that hauled-out seal numbers increased during the ebbing tide, with highest numbers observed from about 3.5 h before low tide until half an hour after (Cunningham et al 2010). So in addition to the in-water behaviour, the haul-out patterns appear relatively unusual and contrasts with the more traditional understanding that haul-out behaviour peaks at the transition of ebb and flood tides (Schneider and Payne 1983; Pauli and Terhune 1987); this adds to increasing evidence that haul-out patterns of harbour seals in some locations may not be driven by tide but by a complex interaction of environmental variables such as diel rhythms (Calambokidis et al 1987; Hamilton et al 2014), predation risk (London et al 2012) and weather conditions (Schneider and Payne 1983; Grellier et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sightings in the water peaked during the flood tide (when the current flowed northwards) around 1–2 h before high tide and were at a minimum during the ebb (southward) tide around 1–2 h before low tide; conversely, numbers of seals that were hauled out peaked during the ebb tide and were at a minimum during the flood tide. These results support preliminary surveys in this area which observed that hauled-out seal numbers increased during the ebbing tide, with highest numbers observed from about 3.5 h before low tide until half an hour after (Cunningham et al 2010). So in addition to the in-water behaviour, the haul-out patterns appear relatively unusual and contrasts with the more traditional understanding that haul-out behaviour peaks at the transition of ebb and flood tides (Schneider and Payne 1983; Pauli and Terhune 1987); this adds to increasing evidence that haul-out patterns of harbour seals in some locations may not be driven by tide but by a complex interaction of environmental variables such as diel rhythms (Calambokidis et al 1987; Hamilton et al 2014), predation risk (London et al 2012) and weather conditions (Schneider and Payne 1983; Grellier et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The mean spring tidal height range is 4.5 m, and the mean neap range is 1.8 m (SeaGeneration (Kyle Rhea) Ltd 2012). During summer months (April–Sept), up to 85 harbour seals have been reported to haul-out on intertidal rocks along the sides of the channel (Cunningham et al 2010) and are present in lower numbers (∼5 individuals) during other times of the year (SeaGeneration (Kyle Rhea) Ltd 2012).
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey altitude (670 m) was sufficiently high that noise from the aircraft should not have had an impact on the behaviour of the seals. Various other studies using aircraft flying at lower altitudes (100 to 300 m), report no specific disturbance to the normal haul-out behaviour of harbour seals from the passing aircraft [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [47], [48]. Harbour seal groups do rush to the sea modestly often, without specific apparent external stimuli, in this and other populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Fourth, a correction factor computed from a sample associated with more than one haul‐out site is unlikely to be accurate. Not only do the environmental factors that affect haulout vary between sites, but haul‐out patterns themselves, as functions of environmental factors, vary between sites, necessitating a different correction factor for each site (Calambokidis et al [], Olesiuk et al [], Baird []; Huber et al [], Simpkins et al [], Cunningham et al []).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Frost et al [] found that many surveys ignored environmental effects, Cunningham et al [] point out that an understanding of the factors influencing haulout is crucial for reducing the large variability between surveys. These factors include time of year, time of day, state of tide, tide height, current velocity, substrate, weather, wave intensity, El Niño effects, and level of disturbance (Sullivan [], Schneider and Payne [], Allen et al [], Pauli and Terhune [], Yochem et al [], Thompson et al [], Olesiuk et al [], Thompson and Harwood [], Helander and Bignert [], Moss [], Kroll [], Suryan [], Frost et al [], Baird [], Henry and Hammill [], Simpkins et al [], Ver Hoef and Frost [], Hayward et al [], Patterson and Acevedo‐Gutiérrez [], Becker et al [], Cunningham et al [, ], Acevedo‐Gutiérrez and Cendejas‐Zarelli []).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%