1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96457.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Genetic Diversity across the Range of North American Brown Bears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
162
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
162
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The brown bear case study The dramatic range of genetic diversity in brown bears that was observed by Paetkau et al (1998b) in North America is also evident at the global scale ( Table 2). Most of the observed patterns are expected-high genetic diversity in large populations (Alaska, Canada, Carpathians, Dinaric Mountains) and very low levels of genetic diversity in populations that have been isolated for a long time or have passed through severe demographic bottlenecks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The brown bear case study The dramatic range of genetic diversity in brown bears that was observed by Paetkau et al (1998b) in North America is also evident at the global scale ( Table 2). Most of the observed patterns are expected-high genetic diversity in large populations (Alaska, Canada, Carpathians, Dinaric Mountains) and very low levels of genetic diversity in populations that have been isolated for a long time or have passed through severe demographic bottlenecks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This latter population is relatively large (42500) and healthy, with low genetic diversity attributed to a long period of isolation from the bears on the continent (Paetkau et al, 1998a(Paetkau et al, , 1998b. On the other hand, the demographic history of the other populations with low genetic diversity is presumed to be one of a recent contraction and isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Genetic differentiation of populations on the basis of microsatellites is often measured by using one of four standard parameters, D, F ST , R ST , and (␦ ) 2 . It is difficult to select a single adequate measure of differentiation (8,9) because of uncertainly concerning the underlying mutation processes (IAM and SMM). Furthermore, it can be argued a priori as well as empirically from the literature that different parameters have different drawbacks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was originally defined as an average value over all loci examined, but it can also be defined at each locus separately. Several variations of D have been used, for example, D C (20), D A , D m (14), D SW (17), and D LR (9). In a bear study (9), D and D LR were comparably satisfactory but failed to resolve the most distantly related pairs of species: when loci have no alleles shared between two populations, D and D LR are not defined or, as has been proposed by Nei (14), take an infinite value that is problematical for any quantitative comparison.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each locus, average ranking values were determined. Moreover, the probability of identity was estimated with a correction for small sample size (P ID unbiased; Paetkau et al, 1998) and the equivalent probability for a pair of siblings (P ID sib; Waits et al, 2001) with GenAlEx 6.41 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006). These values were used to estimate the minimum number of loci required for describing unique individual genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%