2007
DOI: 10.1080/11263500701625897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: Beech (Fagus sylvaticaL.), Norway spruce (Picea abiesL. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.)

Abstract: Fine roots (52 mm) are very dynamic and play a key role in forest ecosystem carbon and nutrient cycling and accumulation. We reviewed root biomass data of three main European tree species European beech, (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), in order to identify the differences between species, and within and between vegetation zones, and to show the relationships between root biomass and the climatic, site and stand factors. The collected literature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
129
9
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
17
129
9
5
Order By: Relevance
“…in July, the quantity of dead fine roots in spruce (868 kg/ha) was 1.4 times lower than in beech (1,253 kg/ha). Similar results can be found in the paper of Finér et al (2007). These authors processed the data originating from many sites all over the European temperate zone.…”
Section: Vertical Distribution and Seasonal Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in July, the quantity of dead fine roots in spruce (868 kg/ha) was 1.4 times lower than in beech (1,253 kg/ha). Similar results can be found in the paper of Finér et al (2007). These authors processed the data originating from many sites all over the European temperate zone.…”
Section: Vertical Distribution and Seasonal Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.; Schmid 2002), Norway spruce, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Finér et al 2007), Scots pine and Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L., Konôpka et al 2005), among a variety of broadleaves (Rewald, Leuschner 2009). Most studies have a limited possibility to generalize their findings because of including only few features of fine roots and/or site-specific results (an exception can be found in Finér et al 2007). Hence, more comprehensive studies on fine roots (mainly necromass, biomass, vertical distribution, seasonal dynamics, turnover, morphological traits, stress responses) in a variety of tree species originating from contrasting growth conditions will be valuable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, after K-fertilization, the basal area to fine root biomass did not change which suggests that there is no major change in allocation, but rather larger trees support a larger fine root system, and that this is formed preferentially in less exploited mineral soil layers. For example, for Picea abies, there is a strong positive correlation between stem cross sectional area and fine root biomass per tree (Finér et al 2007). Thus, larger trees have a higher fine root biomass, and on a stand basis, fine root biomass will be higher without changes in allocation to fine roots.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fine Root Distribution Between Treated and Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published literature is on the characteristics of fine roots in diameter class <2 mm in forests across different species, stand ages, and geo-graphic regions [16,25,26]. However, fine roots in diameter class <2 mm alone are not indicative of the functional potential of the fine root system because this system is composed of individual roots with heterogeneous physiological and morphological traits [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%