2014
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.113.004573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders for Patients With Ischemic Stroke

Abstract: Background and purpose Decisions on life-sustaining treatments and the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders can affect early mortality after stroke. We investigated the variation in early DNR utilization after stroke among hospitals in California, and the impact of this variation on mortality-based hospital classifications. Methods Using the California State Inpatient Database from 2005–2011, ischemic stroke admissions for patients age ≥50 were identified. Cases were categorized by the presence/absence of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported rates of DNR orders in patients hospitalized with other disease conditions, ranging from 9% in acute myocardial infarction, 22 13-22% in acute stroke, 23, 24 22% in community-acquired pneumonia, 25 to 38-47% in initial survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. 26, 27 While these prior studies reported overall rates of DNR, they did not assess whether code status decision-making was aligned with a patient's prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported rates of DNR orders in patients hospitalized with other disease conditions, ranging from 9% in acute myocardial infarction, 22 13-22% in acute stroke, 23, 24 22% in community-acquired pneumonia, 25 to 38-47% in initial survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. 26, 27 While these prior studies reported overall rates of DNR, they did not assess whether code status decision-making was aligned with a patient's prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide hospital variation in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders for stroke patients has been previously demonstrated and are strongly linked to hospital stroke mortality estimates. 41,42 Third, while we accounted for regional differences in race, other socioeconomic factors may account for some of the unexplained variation in outcomes. This may be particularly important for readmissions, which are highly influenced by socioeconomic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,2628 Moreover, patients made DNR were less likely to receive appropriate medical care unrelated to emergent resuscitation, such as intensive care unit transfer, intravenous antihypertensive therapy, and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis for intracranial hemorrhage, 3 cardiac catheterization and internal cardiac defibrillator placement for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 25 and left ventricular function assessment, renin-angiotensin system blockade, and diet/lifestyle counseling for heart failure. 4 Finally, four studies have previously addressed variation across hospitals in regard to early DNR status adoption and associated survival outcomes, albeit in different cohorts of patients with intracranial hemorrhage, 22 ischemic stroke, 24 traumatic brain injury, 29 or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 25 (a very different population than that of patients with in-hospital arrest events 30,31 ). As with our study results, all four prior studies also reported wide variation in hospital rates of DNR status adoption, from 0 to 80%, and worse survival associated with higher hospital rates of DNR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%