2007
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in crustal structure along the Kyushu-Palau Ridge at 15–21°N on the Philippine Sea plate based on seismic refraction profiles

Abstract: We acquired coincident wide-angle and multi-channel seismic reflection data along four profiles perpendicular to the Kyushu-Palau Ridge (KPR) between 15• N and 20• N on the Philippine Sea plate. The crustal thickness beneath the KPR, which is a remnant arc created in the Late Eocene, varies along the strike from 8 to approximately 20 km and is always thicker than the adjacent oceanic crust of the West Philippine Basin to the west and the Parece Vela Basin to the east. The thickest crust among the four profiles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar thin crust with a thin Layer 3 has also been reported in the Parece Vela Basin to the south of the SB (Nishizawa et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2008). The backarc basin crust of the eastern Philippine Sea plate is significantly thinner than both average oceanic crust, which is 7.1±0.8 km thick (White et al, 1992) and the typical oceanic crust recently surveyed in the NPB, which was produced with a fast spreading half-rate >8 cm/year at a mid-ocean ridge (Oikawa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar thin crust with a thin Layer 3 has also been reported in the Parece Vela Basin to the south of the SB (Nishizawa et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2008). The backarc basin crust of the eastern Philippine Sea plate is significantly thinner than both average oceanic crust, which is 7.1±0.8 km thick (White et al, 1992) and the typical oceanic crust recently surveyed in the NPB, which was produced with a fast spreading half-rate >8 cm/year at a mid-ocean ridge (Oikawa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…OBS receivers were deployed at a standard interval of 5 km. The procedure for data processing and velocity analysis was the same as that used by Nishizawa et al (2007Nishizawa et al ( , 2009. The OBS travel time data were modeled by tomographic inversion (tomo2D; Korenaga et al, 2000) and two-dimensional ray tracing using the graph method (Kubota et al, 2009), and field data were compared to synthetic seismograms (E3D; Larsen and Schultz, 1995).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), which can be attributed to the level of maturity in arc crustal evolution , the amount of back arc extension (Nishizawa et al, 2007), and the magmatic production rate (Christeson et al, 2008). Mature island arc systems, such as the Izu-Bonin-Mariana system, have three crustal layers which were developed by partial melting of the initial immature basaltic arc crust .…”
Section: Island Arcs: Modern Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The felsic mid-crustal unit is produced by repetitive anatexis of the mafic lower crust Rioux et al, 2010). Juvenile island arcs are believed to lack this felsic middle layer, as in the cases of the Lesser Antilles and Leeward Antilles (Magnani et al, 2009;Christeson et al, 2008) and parts of the Kyushu-Palau Ridge (Nishizawa et al, 2007). The mid-crustal layer of the mature Aleutian arc, on the other hand, is inferred to be of a more mafic than intermediate composition, based on the higher seismic velocities at depths of 11-20 km (Shillington et al, 2004).…”
Section: Island Arcs: Modern Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many geological and geophysical investigations into the PSP have been reported (Seekins and Teng 1977;Seno and Maruyama 1984;Yu and Chang 1991;Oda and Senna 1994;Hall et al 1995;Nakamura and Shibutani 1998;Okino et al 1998Okino et al , 1999Yang and Wang 1998;Fujioka et al 1999;Yu et al 2000;Kamimura et al 2002;Okino and Fujioka 2003;Ohara 2006;Chang et al 2007;Ishihara and Koda 2007;Nishizawa et al 2007Nishizawa et al , 2011Isse et al 2009;Yeh et al 2013). These previous studies suggested that different tectonic/geological structures show distinct velocity structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%