Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.2307/2426751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) Canopy Morphology in Relation to Habitat, Soil Fertility and Associated Annual Plant Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant clumps are often associated with sediment deposition either in mounds below the canopy or in microfans uphill of them. The first, characterized by their fine texture, are the result of atmospheric dust trapped by the canopies as dry deposition or wind-transported sediment and organic debris (DeSoyza et al, 1997) and also from differential splash, as postulated by several authors (Parsons et al, 1992;Bochet et al, 2002) as a consequence of the strong reduction of kinetic energy below shrub canopies, i.e. 70 per cent of open rainfall in Larrea tridentata (Wainwright et al, 1999).…”
Section: Effects Of Plant Canopies On the Underlying Soilmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Plant clumps are often associated with sediment deposition either in mounds below the canopy or in microfans uphill of them. The first, characterized by their fine texture, are the result of atmospheric dust trapped by the canopies as dry deposition or wind-transported sediment and organic debris (DeSoyza et al, 1997) and also from differential splash, as postulated by several authors (Parsons et al, 1992;Bochet et al, 2002) as a consequence of the strong reduction of kinetic energy below shrub canopies, i.e. 70 per cent of open rainfall in Larrea tridentata (Wainwright et al, 1999).…”
Section: Effects Of Plant Canopies On the Underlying Soilmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many studies have shown that woody species can increase soil nutrients and organic matter because of the accumulation of litter beneath their canopies (e.g. Soriano & Sala 1986;Aguiar & Sala 1994), trapping of windblown particles (Escudero et al 1985;DeSoyza et al 1997), or symbiotic associations with N-fixing micro-organisms (Chapin et al 1994;Alpert & Mooney 1996). The 'canopy effect' and the 'soil effect' are also interrelated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a dominant in the community, it affects soil resources by creating fertile islands in low-fertility soil, and by changing soil water storage patterns (Martinez-Meza & Whitford, 1996;Whitford et al, 1995Whitford et al, , 1997. These effects on the soil resources appear to be time dependent (de Soyza et al, 1997). Here, the effects of creosotebush of documented age on soil properties and other species in the plant community are also examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%