2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in canopy structure, light and soil nutrition across elevation of a Sri Lankan tropical rain forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally a weak relationship was observed between average crown area with insolation in the closedcanopy BRNP study area. A similar trend for the variation in tree crowns has been reported through field investigation in dipterocarp dominated tropical rainforest in Sri Lanka (Ashton, 1992;Ediriweera et al, 2008). In this study the greatest maximum overstorey height was observed on lower slopes in both study areas and thus the variation of crown area appear be related to decrease in tree stature.…”
Section: Studying Relationships Between Vegetation Structure-environmentsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally a weak relationship was observed between average crown area with insolation in the closedcanopy BRNP study area. A similar trend for the variation in tree crowns has been reported through field investigation in dipterocarp dominated tropical rainforest in Sri Lanka (Ashton, 1992;Ediriweera et al, 2008). In this study the greatest maximum overstorey height was observed on lower slopes in both study areas and thus the variation of crown area appear be related to decrease in tree stature.…”
Section: Studying Relationships Between Vegetation Structure-environmentsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Presumably, potential insolation or TWI was not able to describe the variation in forest structure in the hilly subtropical rainforests compared to the open-canopy eucalypt forests. This indicates that forest structure of subtropical rainforest of the BRNP can be expected to overstorey height decreased with increased elevation in the BRNP as is reported by many studies that have measured forest structure across elevation gradients elsewhere (Weaver & Murphy, 1990;Singh et al, 1994;Ediriweera et al, 2008). Due to dramatic changes in the processes causing hillslope erosion especially in areas such as the BRNP (high rainfall compared to the RRNP), soil and soil nutrients tend to accumulate to considerable depths in valleys, which have contributed to the spatial distribution of the nutrient pool and subsequently changes in vegetation structure.…”
Section: Studying Relationships Between Vegetation Structure-environmentsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The method assumes that if topographically-induced illumination of an image has been effectively corrected, the spectral variability in each land cover class would be reduced, hence providing greater distinction between land cover classes. However, topography not only modifies the illumination of terrain, but also substantially modifies the biophysical properties of vegetation (e.g., foliage cover) on complex topography [11][12][13]. Unless very detailed land cover mapping is available, the land cover classification approach generally assesses the accuracy of topographically-corrected reflectance without separating the effects of within-class variation in biophysical properties of vegetation, due to topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergent species of mixed deciduous forests have closed canopies in the growing (wet) season and open canopies in the dry season; this seasonal variation influences seedling dormancy and makes establishment under the canopy difficult (Marod et al 1999). Areas with low tree stem densities have canopy breaks through which direct sunlight may reach the ground surface and promote seedling establishment (De Gouvenain et al 2007;Ediriweera et al 2008). The survival of juveniles varies by canopy openness; it is elevated in sites where more sunlight is available (Dupuy and Chazdon 2008).…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Tree Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%