2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements among women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stacks of 2D T2-weighted images and ADC maps covering the cervical tumor were acquired on Siemens MRI systems [15]. The ADC maps were acquired according to the parameter sets in Table E1 (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Mri Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stacks of 2D T2-weighted images and ADC maps covering the cervical tumor were acquired on Siemens MRI systems [15]. The ADC maps were acquired according to the parameter sets in Table E1 (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Mri Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalization was applied to the whole image (not only within the ROI), by subtracting mean intensity centring it and dividing by the standard deviation. An additional biological-based normalization was considered by drawing a circular ROI of 10 mm diameter in the middle of the bladder, where the urine signal was maximum for each patient [15]. Each intensity level was then normalized by dividing original values by the median intensity of the ROI.…”
Section: Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher B-values are preferred as the ratio of tumour signalesurroundings is less; however, differences were <10% even for quantitative ADC analyses. 32 Therefore, due to the qualitative nature and the relatively small difference in B-value, the present results are not expected to be hampered due to the change in protocol. Changes in imaging protocol are common and reflect general practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Gladwish et al evaluated ADC prior to radiation treatment and found a difference of 10% between 2D and 3D techniques, with good interobserver variability. [28] The size of a circle-like ROI is important in this respect [29], with breast and rectal carcinoma studies suggesting that a small ROI contributes to greater variability in ADC in comparison with a freehand ROI delineating as much as possible of the visible tumor. [19,22,30] To date, the correlation between lymph node metastases and ADC Mean shows a substantial variety in different retrospective studies [14]; however, the majority of studies found a correlation [13,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%