2014
DOI: 10.4171/jems/487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation for the Riesz transform and uniform rectifiability

Abstract: Abstract. For 1 ≤ n < d integers and ρ > 2, we prove that an n-dimensional AhlforsDavid regular measure µ in R d is uniformly n-rectifiable if and only if the ρ-variation for the Riesz transform with respect to µ is a bounded operator in L 2 (µ). This result can be considered as a partial solution to a well known open problem posed by G. David and S. Semmes which relates the L 2 (µ) boundedness of the Riesz transforms to the uniform rectifiability of µ.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article is devoted to obtain L p (1 < p < ∞) and weak-L 1 estimates for the variation for Calderón-Zygmund operators with smooth odd kernel with respect to uniformly rectifiable measures. As a matter of fact, we prove that if the L 2 estimate holds then the L p and weak-L 1 estimates follow; the results in [17] deal with the L 2 case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article is devoted to obtain L p (1 < p < ∞) and weak-L 1 estimates for the variation for Calderón-Zygmund operators with smooth odd kernel with respect to uniformly rectifiable measures. As a matter of fact, we prove that if the L 2 estimate holds then the L p and weak-L 1 estimates follow; the results in [17] deal with the L 2 case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The proof of (c) =⇒ (a) in Corollary 1.3 is not as hard as the converse implications. Essentally, a combination of the arguments in [20] with the fact that, in a sense, V ρ • R µ controls R µ * does the job (see [17]). Theorem 1.1 is used to prove that (a) =⇒ (b) in Corollary 1.3, the corresponding result in [17] was only proved for p = 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Set R μ := {R μ } >0 . By combining some techniques from [9,28], in our forthcoming paper [21], we show that the L 2 (μ) boundedness of V ρ • R μ implies that μ is uniformly n-rectifiable. Moreover, we also prove that V ρ • R μ is bounded in L 2 (μ) for all AD regular uniformly n-rectifiable measures μ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…is bounded We have to prove that there exists a constant C > 0 such that, for any f ∈ L ∞ (H n Γ ) and any cubeD ⊂ R n , there exists some constant c depending on f and D such that yields the boundedness of this operator from L 1 (H n Γ ) to L 1,∞ (H n Γ ). The interested reader may see [21], where a more general result is proved.…”
Section: The Operatormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation