Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9756-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation and Impact of Muscle Thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjective determinations of bovine muscularity usually are based on visual assessments of morphologic factors concerning size, shape and position of the musculature in relation to the skeleton (Kauffman et al, 1970). The major determinant of muscularity is thickness of muscle (independent of fatness) relative to dimensions of the skeleton (de Boer et al, 1974;Dumont, 1978). Variation in muscularity also is reflected by differences in body shapeconvex, bulging shapes for muscular cattle vs concave, flat, angular shapes for thinly muscled cattle (Kauffman et al, 1973).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective determinations of bovine muscularity usually are based on visual assessments of morphologic factors concerning size, shape and position of the musculature in relation to the skeleton (Kauffman et al, 1970). The major determinant of muscularity is thickness of muscle (independent of fatness) relative to dimensions of the skeleton (de Boer et al, 1974;Dumont, 1978). Variation in muscularity also is reflected by differences in body shapeconvex, bulging shapes for muscular cattle vs concave, flat, angular shapes for thinly muscled cattle (Kauffman et al, 1973).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle fibre diameter were found high in case of thigh muscle as compared to breast muscle in the same group which might be due to type of muscles and exercise (Dumont, 1978). However, muscle fibre diameter was observed exceptionally high in case of thigh muscle of desi, which might be due to breed, type of muscle and exercise (Goldspink, 1962;Dumont, 1978). The effect of enzyme treatment did not show differences in the MFD of control of the respective muscle in their respective groups on incubation at 60°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some workers reported no difference in MFD due to sex and muscle type in case of rabbit (Nath and Narayan Rao, 1983), while differences occurred due to age and plain of nutrition (Joubert, 1956), However, present result agrees with the finding of Hammond (1932) and Joubert (1956), who reported in case of pig that MFD differ from one muscle to another, between species, breed and sex as reported. Muscle fibre diameter were found high in case of thigh muscle as compared to breast muscle in the same group which might be due to type of muscles and exercise (Dumont, 1978). However, muscle fibre diameter was observed exceptionally high in case of thigh muscle of desi, which might be due to breed, type of muscle and exercise (Goldspink, 1962;Dumont, 1978).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%