2019
DOI: 10.1075/slcs.207.04bul
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation and change of plural verbs in Salzburg’s base dialects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on real-and apparent-time studies, Bülow et al (2019) also found recent evidence for the use of three-form plurals in Salzburg. Their results, however, indicate that the three-form plural has lost ground over the past hundred years, whereas the use of two-form plurals has largely increased.…”
Section: Anlaut and Stem Vowelmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on real-and apparent-time studies, Bülow et al (2019) also found recent evidence for the use of three-form plurals in Salzburg. Their results, however, indicate that the three-form plural has lost ground over the past hundred years, whereas the use of two-form plurals has largely increased.…”
Section: Anlaut and Stem Vowelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As mentioned above, Bülow et al (2019) and Mauser (2007) point out that we havetodistinguish differentv ariants of three-and two-form plurals for sein in Salzburg'sbase dialects (see Table 1): Va riant 1(ABC =-EN, -TS, -NT) is athreeform plural and corresponds with the MHG three-form plural (cf. Paul 25 2007: 240-242; Table 3).…”
Section: Anlaut and Stem Vowelmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In variationist sociolinguistics, references to the dynamic complex and adaptive systems framework in the realm of individuals' linguistic behaviour are rarely made in order to explain language development (but cf. Bülow et al 2018Bülow et al , 2019)although such an endeavour would deliver various benefits. Bülow and Vergeiner's contribution, for instance, is an attempt to provide explicit references to the CDST by example of sociolinguistic panel data that demonstrate that group-derived estimates cannot be easily generalised to individual language usage and vice versa.…”
Section: Intra-individual Variation Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%