2012
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variants of Uncertain Significance inBRCA1andBRCA2assessment of in silico analysis and a proposal for communication in genetic counselling

Abstract: As in silico analysis alone is not always sufficient to unambiguously assign VUS to either class II or class III, we would argue that the prospect of obtaining additional information from a family should be given more weight during the decision process preceding the communication of a VUS test result. Research initiatives such as the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA), which strive to combine diverse sources of information, will be valuable in aiding a definitive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple strategies are often combined and required to determine if a VUS is pathogenic or benign (Eggington et al, 2014;Millot et al, 2012;Moghadasi et al, 2013;Radice, De Summa, Caleca, & Tommasi, 2011;Rehm et al, 2013;Sijmons, Greenblatt, & Genuardi, 2013). Most laboratories use a variety of methods to reclassify a variant (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Reclassification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple strategies are often combined and required to determine if a VUS is pathogenic or benign (Eggington et al, 2014;Millot et al, 2012;Moghadasi et al, 2013;Radice, De Summa, Caleca, & Tommasi, 2011;Rehm et al, 2013;Sijmons, Greenblatt, & Genuardi, 2013). Most laboratories use a variety of methods to reclassify a variant (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Reclassification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is not yet possible to report VUS using a universally accepted reference. Using multiple references from international networks to collect and interpret VUS data including clinical, functional, pathological, and in silico analyses may provide a way to share comprehensive BRCA1/2 information [25]. For now, using a single reference for interpreting VUS data should be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a disorder like breast cancer, the frequency of VUS fi ndings in genes like BRCA1 and BRCA2 is around 15 % of results [ 15 ].…”
Section: Traditional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%