Proceedings of the Third AIUCD Annual Conference on Humanities and Their Methods in the Digital Ecosystem 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2802612.2802614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variants and Versioning between Textual Bibliography and Computer Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it enables quantitative analyses with greater precision and eciency. 2 For examples of dierent variant classications, see Colwell and Tune (1964) and Italia, Vitali, and Di Iorio (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it enables quantitative analyses with greater precision and eciency. 2 For examples of dierent variant classications, see Colwell and Tune (1964) and Italia, Vitali, and Di Iorio (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could say that the disappearance of manuscript variants, now that creativity is no longer developed on white paper but on computer screens, has aroused a new interest in authors' corrections, and has overcome the old methodological differences. The study of authors' variants has also taken on an interdisciplinary perspective, with various projects of stratigraphic analysis of manuscripts, and with digital philology projects (such as Philoeditor Manzoni, see Di Iorio et al 2014), which have pushed authorial philology to dialogue and collaborate with other philologies, with a view to extending the study of authorial variants to all disciplines based on the evidence of the document: history, philosophy, science, physics.…”
Section: Authorial Philology In the Latest Decadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could say that the disappearance of manuscript variants, now that creativity is no longer developed on white paper but on computer screens, has aroused a new interest in authors' corrections, and has overcome the old methodological differences. The study of authors' variants has also taken on an interdisciplinary perspective, with various projects of stratigraphic analysis of manuscripts, and with digital philology projects (such as Philoeditor Manzoni, see Di Iorio et al 2014), which have pushed authorial philology to dialogue and collaborate with other philologies, with a view to extending the study of authorial variants to all disciplines based on the evidence of the document: history, philosophy, science, physics.…”
Section: Authorial Philology In the Latest Decadementioning
confidence: 99%