2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21001-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variant Calling Using Whole Genome Resequencing and Sequence Capture for Population and Evolutionary Genomic Inferences in Norway Spruce (Picea Abies)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If one allows for 10% or 20% missing data in the GBS results, the size of the regions covered increase to 1.4 Mb and 1.6 Mb, respectively. Repetitive regions are also problematic for downstream genotyping [25], regardless of method and the greater fraction of repetitive regions in the GBS could hence further skew the results from these regions. The overall summary of the data (Table 2) show that the capture probes generates more data both in terms of total size and number of unique scaffolds and also, as expected, contain a greater fraction coding regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If one allows for 10% or 20% missing data in the GBS results, the size of the regions covered increase to 1.4 Mb and 1.6 Mb, respectively. Repetitive regions are also problematic for downstream genotyping [25], regardless of method and the greater fraction of repetitive regions in the GBS could hence further skew the results from these regions. The overall summary of the data (Table 2) show that the capture probes generates more data both in terms of total size and number of unique scaffolds and also, as expected, contain a greater fraction coding regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequencing and SNP calling procedures for these samples have previously been described in detail in Bernhardsson et al [25] and Wang et al [24]. Briefly, DNA was extracted with a Qiagen plant mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the instructions for the WGS data.…”
Section: Whole-genome Re-sequencing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variants were filtered according to Bernhardsson et al (2020) with minor modifications. Briefly, only biallelic SNPs within the extended probe regions were included with QualbyDepth > 2.0, FisherStrand < 60.0, RMSMappingQuality (MQ) > 40, MappingQualityRankSumTest (MQRankSum) > −12.5, ReadPosRankSumTest (ReadPosRankSum) > –8.0, StrandOddsRatio (SOR) < 3.0 using vcftools (Danecek et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sequencing data were aligned to the Saccharum spontaneum reference genome [11] by BWA software (fast and accurate short read alignment with the Burrows-Wheeler Transform) [12] (PCR duplicates reads were further removed by Samtools (v1.3.167, the Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools) [13]. SNPs were identi ed among 216 samples by the HaplotypeCaller module of GATK (v3.868) in GVCF mode (The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data) [14]. Then a joint call was performed using GATK GenotypeGVCFs for all 216 samples.…”
Section: Linkage Disequilibrium Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%