2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
162
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
162
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study it is demonstrated that drawing tests are influenced, to a certain extent, by the subject's cognitive style. The findings are consistent with previous studies that found an association between cognitive style and visual design capabilities high [15,16], and artistic abilities [24]. The differences obtained in the present study were clear, distinct and significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study it is demonstrated that drawing tests are influenced, to a certain extent, by the subject's cognitive style. The findings are consistent with previous studies that found an association between cognitive style and visual design capabilities high [15,16], and artistic abilities [24]. The differences obtained in the present study were clear, distinct and significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Verbal people are creating images if they try, but it is not a natural situation for them [14]. Accordingly, it is common for example to associate designer as of visual thinking ability, when representations that serve them are not only verbal, but also have a variety of shapes and patterns [15]. Evidence of this assumption was by correlating acceptance tests for Architecture by their cognitive style.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the comments by students, the material constraints seemed to help "ground" them by providing specific materials to ideate off of. This is consistent with studies that have shown the impact of visual stimuli for inspiration (Goldschmidt and Smolkov, 2006;López-Mesa et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This result shows how, even though the end users pursued the original icon feature, they thought that the binocular metaphor was both more original and more understandable than the traditional magnifying glass searching metaphor, whereas the butterfly metaphor was considered more original but less understandable. The present result supports the finding by Goldschmidt (2006), who proposed that when visual stimuli dramatically increase in originality, a negative effect on practicality may result. Similar results have been highlighted in our previous icon design development project for interactive TV menus (Lim et al, 2006).…”
Section: Originality Versus Practicalitysupporting
confidence: 82%