2017
DOI: 10.1101/223917
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance reduction for antithetic integral control of stochastic reaction networks

Abstract: The antithetic integral feedback motif recently introduced in [6] is known to ensure robust perfect adaptation for the mean dynamics of a given molecular species involved in a complex stochastic biomolecular reaction network. However, it was observed that it also leads to a higher variance in the controlled network than that obtained when using a constitutive (i.e. open-loop) control strategy. This was interpreted as the cost of the adaptation property and may be viewed as a performance deterioration for the o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, adjusting the biosensor parameters remains challenging and a strategy that relies on model-based design has been recently proposed by Mannan et al (2017). Here, we introduce an approach that combines the indirect measurement of the chemical target with an integral antithetic feedback controller, which has been demonstrated robust against environmental variability (Briat et al, 2016). A circuit called extended metabolic biosensor is introduced where a small amount of the chemical target is converted through several enzymatic steps into an effector for some given transcription factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, adjusting the biosensor parameters remains challenging and a strategy that relies on model-based design has been recently proposed by Mannan et al (2017). Here, we introduce an approach that combines the indirect measurement of the chemical target with an integral antithetic feedback controller, which has been demonstrated robust against environmental variability (Briat et al, 2016). A circuit called extended metabolic biosensor is introduced where a small amount of the chemical target is converted through several enzymatic steps into an effector for some given transcription factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, integral feedback control appears as a promising solution for robust output regulation against perturbations. The antithetic feedback control is a type of integral control that has been recently shown to be a universal genetic topology that can achieve robust perfect adaptation (Briat et al, 2016) and has already been considered for regulation of metabolic pathways (Briat and Khammash, 2018). Therefore, the use of a genetic circuit implementing an antithetic integral feedback controller in combination with an extended metabolic biosensor seems a promising genetic system for pathway regulation.…”
Section: Response Of the Antithetic Integral Feedback Regulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent example is that of the antithetic integral feedback controller proposed in [3] (see also Fig. 1B) that has been shown to induce an ergodic closedloop network when some conditions on the endogenous network to be controlled are met; see also [17,18]. A major limitation of the ergodicity conditions obtained in [3,15,19] is that they only apply to networks with fixed and known rate parameters -an assumption that is rarely met in practice as the rate parameters are usually poorly known and context dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation shows that the signal transduction process had coupled with dynamic DNA assembly to detect external stimuli and transduce the detected signal into the output to evoke subsequent reactions, all of which represents an organism's adaptation to environmental change ( Figure S18). 5,[24][25][26] An adaptive system can both respond to an incoming stimulus and then recover to prestimulus level, enabling cells to continue sensing and responding to changes in their micromilieu. 4,27,28 To verify the returning of DNAzyme on the membrane surface after the cleavage of stimulus, the fluorescence intensity of Cy5-labeled DNAzyme and FAM-labeled trigger was monitored by confocal microscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%