2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0031-10492009002200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variación geográfica de Ninia atrata en Colombia (Colubridae: Dipsadinae)

Abstract: Se describe la variación y distribución geográfica de Ninia atrata en Colombia basada en 128 ejemplares de mas de 24 localidades. Los ejemplares colombianos presentan un alto grado de polimorfismo en su coloración, mostrando una clara diferencia entre las poblaciones Cis-andinas y Trans-andinas, tanto en coloración del collar nucal, como en su forma, prominencia y en siete de doce proporciones morfométricas. Lavariación encontrada e nestas poblaciones colombianas sugiere una relevancia taxonómica. Sin embargo,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the study of the role of African oil palm plantations in the conservation of snakes in Colombia, we found six specimens of the genus Ninia from the municipality of Tumaco, department of Nariño, Colombia (biogeographical-Chocó region;Poveda-M, et al 2004), that share certain unique similarities traits with each other, but differ from the more northern populations (from Costa Rica and Panamá) of N. maculata stated by Savage & Lahanas (1991) and Auth (1994), or sympatric populations of N. atrata reported by Angarita-Sierra (2009. Also, we made a direct examination of the specimens cited by Castaño-M, et al (2004) as N. maculata and N. atrata, finding that these specimens do not match with the previous descriptions of the taxa or any recognized species of the genus (Hallowell 1845;Peters 1861;Dunn 1935;Savage & Lahanas 1991;Smith & Campbell 1996;Savage 2002;Köhler 2008;Angarita-Sierra 2009, but they shared unique similarities with the specimens collected at the municipality of Tumaco. Hence, it has become clear that these specimens were previously confused with N. maculata as well as with N. atrata by Castaño-M et al (2004) and represent an undescribed species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…During the study of the role of African oil palm plantations in the conservation of snakes in Colombia, we found six specimens of the genus Ninia from the municipality of Tumaco, department of Nariño, Colombia (biogeographical-Chocó region;Poveda-M, et al 2004), that share certain unique similarities traits with each other, but differ from the more northern populations (from Costa Rica and Panamá) of N. maculata stated by Savage & Lahanas (1991) and Auth (1994), or sympatric populations of N. atrata reported by Angarita-Sierra (2009. Also, we made a direct examination of the specimens cited by Castaño-M, et al (2004) as N. maculata and N. atrata, finding that these specimens do not match with the previous descriptions of the taxa or any recognized species of the genus (Hallowell 1845;Peters 1861;Dunn 1935;Savage & Lahanas 1991;Smith & Campbell 1996;Savage 2002;Köhler 2008;Angarita-Sierra 2009, but they shared unique similarities with the specimens collected at the municipality of Tumaco. Hence, it has become clear that these specimens were previously confused with N. maculata as well as with N. atrata by Castaño-M et al (2004) and represent an undescribed species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Variation in meristic, color pattern, morphometric and hemipenial characters was evaluated for 70 specimens of Ninia atrata from northern South America. General terminology and morphometric characters of the cephalic shields follows McCranie & Wilson (1995) and Angarita-Sierra (2009). Measurements of the following variables were made with a vernier caliper to the nearest 0.1 mm: head length (HL); head width (HW), paretial length (PL), paretial width (PW), frontal length (FL), frontal width (FW), prefrontal length (PFL), prefrontal width (PFW), internasal length (INL), internasal width (INW), supraocular length (SPL), supreocular height (SPH), loreal height (LH), loreal length (LL), internasal suture (INS) prefrontal suture length (PFS), parietal suture length (PS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations