2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04835-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variables influencing the device-dependent approaches in digitally analysing jaw movement—a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the sensitivity and specificity were above 90%. If oral photographs were collected as data from 100 clinics, there would likely be over a thousand variations from a lack of image standardisation alone [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, the sensitivity and specificity were above 90%. If oral photographs were collected as data from 100 clinics, there would likely be over a thousand variations from a lack of image standardisation alone [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, image standardisation has been a serious limitation in digital dentistry, owing to geographic variations in ambient light, operator-induced errors, and availability of high-end imaging hardware [ 10 , 15 ]. Said variables can rarely be addressed in rural clinics with limited resources, thereby limiting the possibilities of automated diagnostics and advanced tele-dentistry applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 Additionally, mandibular and condylar growth, kinematic dysfunction of the neuromuscular system, shortened dental arches, previous orthodontic treatment, variations in habitual head posture, temporomandibular joint disorders, fricative phonetics, and to a limited extent, parafunctional habits and unbalanced occlusal contact were identified as confounding variables that shaped jaw movement trajectories, but were not highly dependent on age, gender, or diet. 84 Li et al 31 evaluated the accuracy of an experimental jaw tracking system. A maxillary and mandibular complete denture mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator were used to perform small opening and excursive movements.…”
Section: Digital Jaw Tracking Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 The authors concluded that realistic variations in jaw tracking device accuracy ranged from 50 to 330 μm across the digital systems with very low interoperator reliability for motion tracking from photographs. 84 Additionally, mandibular and condylar growth, kinematic dysfunction of the neuromuscular system, shortened dental arches, previous orthodontic treatment, variations in habitual head posture, temporomandibular joint disorders, fricative phonetics, and to a limited extent, parafunctional habits and unbalanced occlusal contact were identified as confounding variables that shaped jaw movement trajectories, but were not highly dependent on age, gender, or diet. 84 Li et al 31 evaluated the accuracy of an experimental jaw tracking system.…”
Section: Digital Jaw Tracking Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised learning occurs when the radiomic data are labelled by human operators prior to AI training while un‐supervised learning is when the AI is capable of training with the data without human intervention 5 . Successful implementation of deep learning in clinical dentistry is primarily seen in supervised or partially unsupervised (semi‐supervised) learning owing to numerous clinical and hardware‐dependent variables, that are yet to be fully understood 6–8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%