Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1216-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable ventilation from bench to bedside

Abstract: This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency medicine 2016. Other selected articles can be found online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2016. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 The lack of improvement in E rs during CVV evidences that the volumepressure relationship of the respiratory system was rather linear, precluding substantial lung recruitment. 28 In view of these facts, we hypothesize that intraoperative atelectasis was relatively low in our patients, which is partially supported by Values are given as mean (SD). Pulmonary function tests refer to expected normal values of patients (%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 The lack of improvement in E rs during CVV evidences that the volumepressure relationship of the respiratory system was rather linear, precluding substantial lung recruitment. 28 In view of these facts, we hypothesize that intraoperative atelectasis was relatively low in our patients, which is partially supported by Values are given as mean (SD). Pulmonary function tests refer to expected normal values of patients (%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We tested CVV, because experimental evidence showed it is effective in recruiting lungs and leads to less impairment of haemodynamics than traditional recruitment manoeuvres. 28 Furthermore, variable V T has been shown to improve lung-protective ventilation strategies in experimental models of acute lung injury. 13,29 To assess the isolated effects of CVV, we maintained mean V T and PEEP comparable between groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that high tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation can initiate or worsen lung injury, a phenomenon known as ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) [ 22 ]. Therefore, protective strategies based upon low distending pressures (driving pressure) and tidal volumes have been developed to reduce the stress of mechanical ventilation to the lung parenchyma [ 23 ]. In experimental ARDS, variable tidal volumes have been shown to improve respiratory lung function, and further reduce histological damage [ 2 ] as well as decrease cytokine release [ 1 ] compared to conventional (non-variable) protective low tidal volumes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EELV ranged from 1.0 to 4.244 L [ 11 , 12 ] with N = 50 alveolar units log-distributed on in the range of 0.01–100. Mean V T was 0.5 L [ 13 ] and was kept constant or with a variability of 25 % [ 14 ]. The was of 0.125 L [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%