2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable universe fuzzy control for vehicle semi-active suspension system with MR damper combining fuzzy neural network and particle swarm optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the performance of the proposed ICQPSO algorithm, six benchmark functions are examined, and statistical results are compared with PSO [13], SINPSO [17], APSO [18], QPSO [21], and HCQPSO [31,32]. QPSO and PSO are the basic traditional algorithms.…”
Section: Performance Tests Of Icqpso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess the performance of the proposed ICQPSO algorithm, six benchmark functions are examined, and statistical results are compared with PSO [13], SINPSO [17], APSO [18], QPSO [21], and HCQPSO [31,32]. QPSO and PSO are the basic traditional algorithms.…”
Section: Performance Tests Of Icqpso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an effective way to improve the FNN performance by replacing the traditional learning algorithm by metaheuristic algorithms such as the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [13][14][15]. However, when the considered problem is a complex high-dimensional problem, PSO algorithm has the disadvantage of premature convergence [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [20] developed an optimized static output feedback controller and reduced by nearly 90% the maximum peak value registered for € Z s and € θ. Pang et al [24] implemented a variable universe fuzzy control with fuzzy neural networks and particle swarm optimization and reduced € Z s and € θ by approximately 39%, whereas suspension deflections (front and rear) were reduced by 33%. In addition, Benariba et al [49] developed a suspension with sliding mode control supplemented with Lyapunov surfaces and managed to reduce the Z s and θ by approximately 40%, while the deflection was reduced by 70%.…”
Section: Comparison With Reported Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were generated in the frequency domain. In addition, Pang et al [24] developed a fuzzy controller for an experimental MR semiactive suspension based on neural networks and particle swarm optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional hydraulic damper, the damping stiffness of MR damper can be changed using an embedded control system, which can produce a controllable magnetic field intensity by the coil placed on the piston. The MR damper was widely used in many fields, such as vehicle suspension systems Yu et al, 2017;Anwesa and Manas, 2018), clutches (Hema et al, 2017;Topcu et al, 2018), bridges and buildings (Mohammad and Amir, 2018) and the control systems for MR damper have been researched (Kang et al, 2018;Pang et al, 2018), by using control system, the damper can be easily controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%