2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2007.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable-strength conditional preferences for ranking objects in ontologies

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce conditional preference bases as a means for ranking objects in ontologies. Conditional preference bases consist of a description logic knowledge base and a finite set of variable-strength conditional preferences. They are inspired by Goldszmidt and Pearl's approach to default reasoning from conditional knowledge bases in System Z + . We define a notion of consistency for conditional preference bases, and show how consistent conditional preference bases can be used for ranking objects in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that b and v 3 are variables, that can unify only with a buyer and a seller, respectively, due to the new definitions (22)(23) of Buyer and Seller. Now we can have two matchmaking services in the marketplace.…”
Section: A General Marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observe that b and v 3 are variables, that can unify only with a buyer and a seller, respectively, due to the new definitions (22)(23) of Buyer and Seller. Now we can have two matchmaking services in the marketplace.…”
Section: A General Marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…terparts, based on textual information [42], or to compare the logical representations of supply and demand [40,27], or combine both scores and logic in some way [20,39,7,22]. Our proposal falls in this last category, mixing in a formal way Datalog, Fuzzy sets, and Utility Theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the pragmatic considerations discussed above lead us to not adopt it directly, although it remains the gold standard. The theories (or models) in our fielded systems are based on qualitative probabilistic matching (Smyth and Poole, 2004;Poole and Smyth, 2005;Lukasiewicz and Schellhase, 2007), with the following properties:…”
Section: Bayesian Modelling Meets Pragmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless in such approaches the matchmaking process is defined according to buyer's perspective. In [16] a language able to express conditional preferences is proposed to perform a matchmaking in Description Logics. Also in this case nothing is said on how to compute a agreementas needed in P2P scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They either try to compute a score of possible counterparts, based on textual information [25], or to compare the logical representations of supply and demand [10], or combine both scores and logic in some way [7,16]. Our proposal falls in this last category, mixing in a formal way ontologies in DLR-Lite, Datalog rules, Fuzzy sets, and Utility Theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%