2010
DOI: 10.1002/for.1164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable selection in STAR models with neighbourhood effects using genetic algorithms

Abstract: In this paper we deal with the problem of variable selection in spatiotemporal autoregressive (STAR) models with neighbourhood effects. We propose a procedure to carry out the selection process, taking into account the uncertainty associated with estimation of the parameters and the predictive behaviour of the compared models, in order to give more realism to the analysis. We set up a multi-objective programming problem that combines the use of different criteria to measure both these aspects. We use genetic a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Griffith (2008) originally proposed forward variable selection to find significant interactions, but this procedure is computationally slow (Seya et al, 2014) and only investigates iteratively a rather small number of variable combinations, posing the danger of an inappropriately selected set of variables. Because the model possibilities are 2 k , where k denotes the number of predictors, testing all possible models to determine the optimal combination computationally is rarely feasible (Alberto, Beamonte, Gargallo, Mateo, & Salvador, 2010). Additionally, simplified models are easier to interpret.…”
Section: Eigenvector Spatial Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Griffith (2008) originally proposed forward variable selection to find significant interactions, but this procedure is computationally slow (Seya et al, 2014) and only investigates iteratively a rather small number of variable combinations, posing the danger of an inappropriately selected set of variables. Because the model possibilities are 2 k , where k denotes the number of predictors, testing all possible models to determine the optimal combination computationally is rarely feasible (Alberto, Beamonte, Gargallo, Mateo, & Salvador, 2010). Additionally, simplified models are easier to interpret.…”
Section: Eigenvector Spatial Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic search strategies, such as genetic algorithms (GA) (Goldberg, 1989;Reggiani, Nijkamp, & Sabella, 2001) imitating natural evolution, are effectively capable of selecting an optimal subset of covariates (e.g. Ahn et al, 2012;Alberto et al, 2010). Nevertheless, these approaches have so far been virtually ignored by real estate economists.…”
Section: Eigenvector Spatial Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the same lines, Beamonte et al (2008Beamonte et al ( , 2010aBeamonte et al ( , 2010bBeamonte et al ( , 2013 and Alberto et al (2010) also employ Bayesian linear regressions, addressing heteroskedasticity problems, to estimate…”
Section: A Systematic Review Of Spatio-temporal Hp Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beamonte et al (2013) produce a constant quality housing index. Alberto et al (2010) developed a "multicriteria" methodology for variable selection and spatio-temporal effects in hedonic models. A genetic algorithm is proposed for identifying Pareto efficient solutions to solve the multi-objective problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large amount of variables in massive datasets causes “curse of dimensionality” (COD), which poses unprecedented challenges and opportunities to forecasting and decision‐making system. To overcome COD, variable selection, which distinguishes important variables from noisy ones, is a popular and powerful technique in the realm of forecasting (Alberto et al, 2010; Hrdle et al, 2009; Refenes & Zapranis, 1999; Zeng, 2017). It can be regarded as a simplification procedure that extracts valuable data information from data by selecting important variable with predictive power (Ballings & Van den Poel, 2015; Bertsimas & Copenhaver, 2014; Ma et al, 2016; Wilms et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%