2001
DOI: 10.1198/108571101300325256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable selection and the interpretation of principal subspaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Software has been written that implements the relevant methodology. 28 Future work may also find that the PCA method may reduce errors in classifying tasks as inside or outside control limits for acceptable driving performance. Type I errors (false positives) mean that a task is classified as outside control limits when it is really inside control limits, leading to unnecessary redesign or lockout of the task while driving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software has been written that implements the relevant methodology. 28 Future work may also find that the PCA method may reduce errors in classifying tasks as inside or outside control limits for acceptable driving performance. Type I errors (false positives) mean that a task is classified as outside control limits when it is really inside control limits, leading to unnecessary redesign or lockout of the task while driving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentages of total variation accounted for by each of the three principal components were 72.76, 7.71 and 6.44% respectively (Table 1). The proportion of total variation more than 75% is acceptable (Cadima & Jolliffe 2001;Jolliffe 2002) for characterization and evaluation of accessions in this genebank collection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At last, to clarify contrast between two gatherings, and to apply right model to another program, i.e., excluded in dataset, it was assessed on the possibility to characterized modules into gatherings utilizing program measurements. To choose best components, i.e., measurements, to use in classifier, feature choice computers was applied, in particular independent features methodology [62]. This technique performs a statistical test for each individual component, showing that distinction is unrealistic to be random variation; if contrast is sig times lower than standard mistake, then highlight is not regarded valuable for ordering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get an exact model, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) strategy was adopted, which changes dependant variables in a small number of uncorrelated variables [62]; yet, this methodology did not enhance model. An exponential and a logarithmic model was assessed, however they were not ready to give better accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%