2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/4626307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Selection and Joint Estimation of Mean and Covariance Models with an Application to eQTL Data

Abstract: In genomic data analysis, it is commonplace that underlying regulatory relationship over multiple genes is hardly ascertained due to unknown genetic complexity and epigenetic regulations. In this paper, we consider a joint mean and constant covariance model (JMCCM) that elucidates conditional dependent structures of genes with controlling for potential genotype perturbations. To this end, the modified Cholesky decomposition is utilized to parametrize entries of a precision matrix. The JMCCM maximizes the likel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, joint variable selection and covariance estimation in high-dimensional settings has generated a lot of interest (Banterle et al, 2018;Consonni, Rocca & Peluso, 2017;Deshpande, Ročková & George, 2019). Examples include the multi-omics data such as eQTL and metabolomics analysis, where gene expression and metabolomics data are simultaneously available and analyzed (see Lee et al, 2018;Nica & Dermitzakis, 2013;Rockman & Kruglyak, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, joint variable selection and covariance estimation in high-dimensional settings has generated a lot of interest (Banterle et al, 2018;Consonni, Rocca & Peluso, 2017;Deshpande, Ročková & George, 2019). Examples include the multi-omics data such as eQTL and metabolomics analysis, where gene expression and metabolomics data are simultaneously available and analyzed (see Lee et al, 2018;Nica & Dermitzakis, 2013;Rockman & Kruglyak, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%