2020
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1763930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable selection and importance in presence of high collinearity: an application to the prediction of lean body mass from multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our sample size (rows) regarding the features had a proportion of 35 to 1, limiting the model ability to generalize high values of R t even though still being able to approach the trend on average. Similar findings were reported in previous studies where RF showed higher robustness to regression applications compared to SVR and ANNs (Li, Yang et al 2016, Wang, Zhou et al 2016) due to the ability to minimize bias in multidimensional datasets (Cammarota and Pinto 2020). This outcome confirms the influence of collinearity of predictors (one predictor can predict another predictor) for SVR in a multivariate regression problem (Dormann, Elith et al 2013) which led to higher E values for the margin selections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our sample size (rows) regarding the features had a proportion of 35 to 1, limiting the model ability to generalize high values of R t even though still being able to approach the trend on average. Similar findings were reported in previous studies where RF showed higher robustness to regression applications compared to SVR and ANNs (Li, Yang et al 2016, Wang, Zhou et al 2016) due to the ability to minimize bias in multidimensional datasets (Cammarota and Pinto 2020). This outcome confirms the influence of collinearity of predictors (one predictor can predict another predictor) for SVR in a multivariate regression problem (Dormann, Elith et al 2013) which led to higher E values for the margin selections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our sample size (rows) regarding the features had a proportion of 35 to 1, limiting the model ability to generalize high values of Rt even though still being able to approach the trend on average. Similar findings were reported in previous studies where RF showed higher robustness to regression applications compared to SVR and ANNs [63,64] due to the ability to minimize bias in multidimensional datasets [65]. This outcome confirms the influence of collinearity of predictors (one predictor can predict another predictor) for SVR in a multivariate regression problem [66] which led to higher values for the margin selections.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, although the contribution of anthropometric measurements in statistical models for the prediction of human body composition (for example, in the estimation of lean body mass) is extremely high and explains over 80% of variability [ 62 ], to explain residual variability, especially in different clinical settings, it is necessary to develop new tools and software that integrate the available analytical methods of human body composition according with the perspective of multicompartmental models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%