2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable response of different functional groups of saproxylic beetles to substrate manipulation and forest management: Implications for conservation strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(62 reference statements)
6
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, dead wood of the first class decay represented by large branches on the ground or standing dead trees and stumps belonging to the third class decay affect positively the richness and abundance of xylophagous beetles that attack fresh dead wood, while standing dead trees belonging to the fourth class decay and dead trees on the ground of second class decay affect hole nesting-birds. In accordance with our results, several studies have shown that unremoved dead wood on the ground (e.g., Johansson et al 2007) or artificially created dead wood microhabitats (e.g., Lindhe and Lindelöw 2004), are used for beetle development and consequently important for hole-nesting bird foraging activity, because the number of trees required for foraging is considerably larger than the number of nest trees (Drapeau et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our analysis, dead wood of the first class decay represented by large branches on the ground or standing dead trees and stumps belonging to the third class decay affect positively the richness and abundance of xylophagous beetles that attack fresh dead wood, while standing dead trees belonging to the fourth class decay and dead trees on the ground of second class decay affect hole nesting-birds. In accordance with our results, several studies have shown that unremoved dead wood on the ground (e.g., Johansson et al 2007) or artificially created dead wood microhabitats (e.g., Lindhe and Lindelöw 2004), are used for beetle development and consequently important for hole-nesting bird foraging activity, because the number of trees required for foraging is considerably larger than the number of nest trees (Drapeau et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In any event, the proportions noted in the present study are not atypical. Fungus-feeders were the most species-rich functional group in a Swedish study of early-successional spruce logs (Johansson et al 2007), while Langor et al (2008) noted that studies of the beetle fauna of aspen wood in both Sweden and Canada had found that species of predators and fungusfeeders numerically dominated the assemblages.…”
Section: Trophic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study, however, revealed lower numbers of beetles per cubic meter of wood in the monodominant plantation and the secondary forest than in mature forest. In other tropical forests, saproxylic beetles responded to the characteristics of the forest structure [30,31]. Here, we found that bess beetles' abundance did not respond to the higher availability of wood in the natural regeneration, both as CWD and as standing snags.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 57%