2015
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2015.2430053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Impedance Control of Redundant Manipulators for Intuitive Human–Robot Physical Interaction

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental study on human-robot comanipulation in the presence of kinematic redundancy. The objective of the work is to enhance the performance during human-robot physical interaction by combining Cartesian impedance modulation and redundancy resolution. Cartesian impedance control is employed to achieve a compliant behavior of the robot's end effector in response to forces exerted by the human operator. Different impedance modulation strategies, which take into account the human's beh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
151
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(64 reference statements)
3
151
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation matches the pHRI result of implementing SDVAC in human/manipulator interaction in [27,37]. existing literature [19,25,27,[30][31][32][33]37]. The viscosity of CAC is conservatively designed for the worst-case stiffness, whereas the viscosity of SDVAC is always smaller than or equal to (in the worst case) the viscosity of CAC.…”
Section: Possible Improvements On the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation matches the pHRI result of implementing SDVAC in human/manipulator interaction in [27,37]. existing literature [19,25,27,[30][31][32][33]37]. The viscosity of CAC is conservatively designed for the worst-case stiffness, whereas the viscosity of SDVAC is always smaller than or equal to (in the worst case) the viscosity of CAC.…”
Section: Possible Improvements On the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, the pHRI stability is often subject to the human arm's stiffness and the admittance parameters. To find appropriate admittance parameters that stabilize the pHRI for a given stiffness, the stability criteria for admittance controllers have been well-studied, especially in human/manipulator interaction [26,27,30,33,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This control method offers Cartesian control based on how much the magnitude of the force is changing, and in which direction the force is being applied on the follower. While this model has been shown to be useful for Cartesian movements, [10], [11], it does not generalize to extended objects due to the rotation-translation problem, nor does it address rotational movements alone. Other proposed models for co-manipulation include programming by demonstration (PBD) [12], [13], finite state machines (FSM) [3], [2], uncertainty control [14], and movement coordination [15].…”
Section: A State-of-the-art Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase a patient's active participation in exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation training, it is necessary to control the exoskeleton robot to track the movement of the lower limb as per the patient's active motion intention [22,23]. Impedance controller or admittance controller have been widely used in exoskeleton control due to their characteristics of human and robot physical interaction [24,25]. The impedance controller calculates the force exerted by the robot to achieve the specified displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%