2011
DOI: 10.5402/2011/915259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Forgetting Factor LS Algorithm for Polynomial Channel Model

Abstract: Variable forgetting factor (VFF) least squares (LS) algorithm for polynomial channel paradigm is presented for improved tracking performance under nonstationary environment. The main focus is on updating VFF when each time-varying fading channel is considered to be a first-order Markov process. In addition to efficient tracking under frequency-selective fading channels, the incorporation of proposed numeric variable forgetting factor (NVFF) in LS algorithm reduces the computational complexity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simulations, the BPSK, 4-QAM and 8-QAM signal constellations mentioned in Su and Xia (2004) 99, 0.75 and 0.005 respectively for all cases. The tracking performance results presented in Kohli et al (2011) depict that LSn2 algorithm (with second-order channel model) combats lag noise more efficiently than LSn algorithm, but at the cost of increased computational complexity. Subsequently, it is apparent from the simulation results shown in Kohli et al (2011) that LSn-VFF and LSn-NVFF algorithms supersede LSn2-VFF and LSn2-NVFF algorithms under time-varying environment.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For simulations, the BPSK, 4-QAM and 8-QAM signal constellations mentioned in Su and Xia (2004) 99, 0.75 and 0.005 respectively for all cases. The tracking performance results presented in Kohli et al (2011) depict that LSn2 algorithm (with second-order channel model) combats lag noise more efficiently than LSn algorithm, but at the cost of increased computational complexity. Subsequently, it is apparent from the simulation results shown in Kohli et al (2011) that LSn-VFF and LSn-NVFF algorithms supersede LSn2-VFF and LSn2-NVFF algorithms under time-varying environment.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The tracking performance results presented in Kohli et al (2011) depict that LSn2 algorithm (with second-order channel model) combats lag noise more efficiently than LSn algorithm, but at the cost of increased computational complexity. Subsequently, it is apparent from the simulation results shown in Kohli et al (2011) that LSn-VFF and LSn-NVFF algorithms supersede LSn2-VFF and LSn2-NVFF algorithms under time-varying environment. Both variable forgetting factors overwhelm the loss in tracking capability caused due to the first-order channel model.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main focus/emphasis is on the usage/incorporation of channel matrix obtained by using the LSn-NVFF (first-order polynomial based approach) and LSn2-NVFF (secondorder polynomial based approach) pilot channel estimation algorithms (Grover and Kohli, 2011), which is the estimated CSI. The value of NVFF increases under stationary conditions for the accurate channel estimation and its value decreases under nonstationary conditions to reduce the lag noise (Kohli et al, 2011). Finally, conclusions and future scope are given for the proposed high data-rate STBC, that is,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSn-VFF algorithm is reported to perform well at high SNRs at the cost of increased computational complexity (Song et al, 2000). However, Kohli et al (2011) presented a computationally efficient channel estimation method using the linear-least-squares algorithm in combination with the numeric-variable-forgetting-factor (LSn-NVFF), which is based on the extended estimation error criterion. In this correspondence, we propose the utilization of LSn-NVFF algorithm based estimated complex channel coefficient matrix for the information symbol detection in high-rate STBC wireless systems akin to that of Grover and Kohli (2011), which is expected to improve the bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the high-rate quasi-orthogonal STBCs (QSTBCs) even at the low SNRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%