2002
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable effects of aging on frontal lobe contributions to memory

Abstract: Declarative memory declines with age, but there is profound variation in the severity of this decline. Healthy elderly adults with high or low memory scores and young adults viewed words under semantic or non-semantic encoding conditions while undergoing fMRI. Young adults had superior memory for the words, and elderly adults with high memory scores had better memory for the words than those with low memory scores. The elderly with high scores had left lateral and medial prefrontal activations for semantic enc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
111
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
20
111
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results provide a strong basis for arguing that the increased allocation of resources to novel stimuli observed in cognitively high performing old adults does not simply represent less efficient processing, but a successful compensatory mechanism, perhaps in response to other age-related declines in neurophysiological functioning. Our findings are consistent with those results from the functional imaging literature that have shown that old subjects who perform comparably to young subjects on source or episodic memory tasks recruit more brain activity than young subjects, and than old subjects who perform worse (Cabeza et al, 2002;Reuter-Lorenz et al, 2000;Rosen et al, 2002) (but see Nielson et al (2002) and Logan et al (2002), whose data indicate that this pattern is not associated with all cognitive functions). Of note, the age-related anterior shift in scalp distribution of the novelty P3 was not different for the cognitively high and average performing old subjects, suggesting that these groups process novelty by relying on a similar underlying neural system, but differ mainly in terms of the amount of resources appropriated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results provide a strong basis for arguing that the increased allocation of resources to novel stimuli observed in cognitively high performing old adults does not simply represent less efficient processing, but a successful compensatory mechanism, perhaps in response to other age-related declines in neurophysiological functioning. Our findings are consistent with those results from the functional imaging literature that have shown that old subjects who perform comparably to young subjects on source or episodic memory tasks recruit more brain activity than young subjects, and than old subjects who perform worse (Cabeza et al, 2002;Reuter-Lorenz et al, 2000;Rosen et al, 2002) (but see Nielson et al (2002) and Logan et al (2002), whose data indicate that this pattern is not associated with all cognitive functions). Of note, the age-related anterior shift in scalp distribution of the novelty P3 was not different for the cognitively high and average performing old subjects, suggesting that these groups process novelty by relying on a similar underlying neural system, but differ mainly in terms of the amount of resources appropriated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although recently there has been a number of studies comparing the neural activity of higher and lower performing old subjects to that of a group of young subjects (Cabeza et al, 2002;Duarte et al, 2006;Rosano et al, 2005;Rosen et al, 2002), only a few reports have taken into account differences in neural activity between groups of young subjects that differed in performance (e.g., Fjell and Walhovd, 2005;Madden et al, 2004;Stern et al, 2004). Without such a comparison group, it is difficult to be sure whether the differences between high and average performing old subjects are related to age, or reflect different levels of performance that would be observed for any age group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compensatory recruitment of additional brain areas likely requires integrity of the corpus callosum, and smaller corpora callosa would be associated with poorer performance. The cooperation hypothesis is supported by reaction time studies showing that older participants profited more from bilateral stimulation conditions, requiring callosal transfer, than from unilateral conditions (Reuter-Lorenz and Stanczak, 2000;Reuter-Lorenz et al, 1999), and by functional imaging studies showing bilateral activation in high but not low performing older adults Rosen et al, 2002). In addition, whether callosal interhemispheric interaction is inhibitory or cooperative may likely depend on task demands, task complexity and the specific process (e.g., inhibition vs. facilitation) and lateralization of functions (e.g., verbal-spatial, local-global).…”
Section: Lateralized Processing and Agementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recently, Cabeza et al (2002) proposed that high-scoring elders, compared with low-performing elders and young subjects, engaged the PFC bilaterally to a functionally useful degree in a source memory task. High-scoring elders also showed preserved left frontal and enhanced right frontal activity versus the young during encoding (Rosen et al, 2002). Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, the PFC activity observed during encoding, predicting subsequent successful recognition, was left-lateralized in young subjects but bilateral in older subjects (Morcom et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%