13th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-1886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable-complexity response surface aerodynamic design of an HSCT wing

Abstract: A design methodology which uses a variable-complexity modeling approach in conjunction with response surface approximation methods has successfully been developed. This technique is applied to an example problem of wing design for a High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) aircraft involving a subset of four HSCT wing design variables. The wing design methodology is applied using a simple algebraic model for the wing weight. The applicability of the methodology for the multidisciplinary design of an HSCT is discussed. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important advantages obtained by using response surface models [15] in optimization is a significant reduction in the computational cost. This allows the user to perform global optimization and reliability-based optimization, which are otherwise prohibitively computationally expensive.…”
Section: Response Surface Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important advantages obtained by using response surface models [15] in optimization is a significant reduction in the computational cost. This allows the user to perform global optimization and reliability-based optimization, which are otherwise prohibitively computationally expensive.…”
Section: Response Surface Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important advantages obtained by using RSMs [15] in optimization is a significant reduction in the computational cost. This allows the user to perform global optimization and reliability-based optimization, which are otherwise prohibitively computationally expensive.…”
Section: Adaptive Response Surface Modeling (Arsm) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Taguchi robust control theory, the above design problem with uncertainties can be converted into the following two-objective optimization problem, one objective is the mean value of the lift coefficient, and the other is the variance of lift coefficient over the range of uncertainty (27) where N = 5, M ∞ = 0.15, and i = [13,14,15,16,17 • ].…”
Section: Single-point Lift Maximization At Landing Flight Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For aircraft structural design, previous decomposition schemes focused on the use of response surface approximations, fit to the values of multiple lower level optima, as a way to integrate the various design levels (e.g., Giunta et al, 1997b;Balabanov et al, 1999;Ragon et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2000). This involved performing hundreds of subsystem optimizations, and fitting the optimal response surface with a polynomial for use by the system optimization algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%