2009
DOI: 10.1177/0022034509341166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Cell Responses to P. gingivalis Lipopolysaccharide

Abstract: Porphyromonas gingivalis is a major etiological agent of chronic periodontal diseases, the virulence of which has been attributed to different factors, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We investigated the differential responses induced by P. gingivalis LPS stimulation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human oral epithelial cells. RT-PCR analysis showed that P. gingivalis LPS used Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) to activate epithelial cells and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to activate endothelial cell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
107
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
107
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as already mentioned, the TLR2 agonist activity in P. gingivalis is most likely due to a lipoprotein, and treatment of LPS with lipoproteinase as free LPS substantially attenuated the TLR2 engaging activity [17]. These findings explain previous observations that P. gingivalis LPS can act both as a TLR4 agonist and antagonist, with an end result of varying cytokine secretion profiles [5,11,12]. Also in HOKs, P. gingivalis LPS 1 , 690 -induced LBP expression occurred through both TLR2 and TLR4 [51], while recombinant rh LBP significantly up regulated the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 in HOKs through the TLR2 signalling pathway [50].…”
Section: Differences In Lipid a Have Different Effects On Tlr Signallingsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as already mentioned, the TLR2 agonist activity in P. gingivalis is most likely due to a lipoprotein, and treatment of LPS with lipoproteinase as free LPS substantially attenuated the TLR2 engaging activity [17]. These findings explain previous observations that P. gingivalis LPS can act both as a TLR4 agonist and antagonist, with an end result of varying cytokine secretion profiles [5,11,12]. Also in HOKs, P. gingivalis LPS 1 , 690 -induced LBP expression occurred through both TLR2 and TLR4 [51], while recombinant rh LBP significantly up regulated the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 in HOKs through the TLR2 signalling pathway [50].…”
Section: Differences In Lipid a Have Different Effects On Tlr Signallingsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Hence in immunological terms, the A-LPS heterogeneous forms represent ‘pathogen associated molecular patterns’ (PAMPs) and have been extensively studied for their role in the pathogenesis of periodontitis (for a review, see Nichols et al [10]), however not without controversy. Whereas some studies reported that P. gingivalis LPS stimulates secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [11], others found contradictory results with regard to cytokine release [5,12]. Besides, LPS acting as an agonist for Toll-like receptor (TLR) TLR2 or as an antagonist and/or agonist for TLR4 activation [1316] added to further contradiction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations into the effect of P. gingivalis LPS on nonpolarized macrophages have shown that the induced immune responses is varied and that many cytokines were only transiently expressed compared to Escherichia coli LPS and other Gram-negative pathogens (7)(8)(9). Furthermore, P. gingivalis LPS is atypical in that it is structurally different from the canonical enterobacterial LPS and has been reported to stimulate both TLR4 and TLR2 (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27) In this study, mRNA expres- sion of TLR2 or TLR4 was also analyzed using real-time RT-PCR to investigate the biological mechanisms of L-bLF supplementation on the decreased inflammatory cytokines from P. gingivalis LPS-stimulated PBMCs. However, mRNA expression levels of these receptors were not changed throughout the test period, which suggests that suppressive effect of L-bLF on LPS-induced inflammatory cytokines production from PBMCs was not due to the regulation of these receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%