2002
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3940409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of sleep parameters across multiple laboratory sessions in healthy young subjects: The “very first night effect”

Abstract: Many studies have been carried out to assess the variability of sleep parameters. The first night effect is one of the most important factors in this variability and has been extensively studied. However, the readaptation phenomenon when subjects returned to the sleep laboratory after spending a certain period of time at home has been not systematically evaluated. To investigate this phenomenon across multiple sleep laboratory sessions, polysomnographic data from 12 healthy young subjects for 12 nights (three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
22
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate data from other laboratories using nondepressed subjects who report lower sleep efficiency, increased wakefulness, less REM and NREM sleep, and longer latencies to sleep onset and REM sleep on the first night (Agnew et al, 1966;Curcio et al, 2004;Lorenzo and Barbanoj, 2002;Mendels and Hawkins, 1967;Schmidt and Kaelbling, 1971;Tamaki et al, 2005;Toussaint et al, 1995;Webb and Campbell, 1979). However, our data contrast with a few studies that failed to find multiple first-night disruptive effects (Browman and Cartwright, 1980;Coble et al, 1974;Kader and Griffin, 1983).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Polysomnographic Sleepsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results corroborate data from other laboratories using nondepressed subjects who report lower sleep efficiency, increased wakefulness, less REM and NREM sleep, and longer latencies to sleep onset and REM sleep on the first night (Agnew et al, 1966;Curcio et al, 2004;Lorenzo and Barbanoj, 2002;Mendels and Hawkins, 1967;Schmidt and Kaelbling, 1971;Tamaki et al, 2005;Toussaint et al, 1995;Webb and Campbell, 1979). However, our data contrast with a few studies that failed to find multiple first-night disruptive effects (Browman and Cartwright, 1980;Coble et al, 1974;Kader and Griffin, 1983).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Polysomnographic Sleepsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[ (Ohayon et al 2004;Carskadon and Dement 2011), except for a small increase in stage 1 which is typical of laboratory studies (Lorenzo and Barbanoj 2002).…”
Section: Behavioural Performancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Polysomnography showed that participants slept very efficiently in the sleep lab (M=92.6%, SEM=1.56%), and exhibited a typical hypnogram (Lorenzo & Barbanoj, 2002) with 11.6% (± 1.56% SEM) N1 sleep, 42.3% (± 1.88% SEM) N2 sleep, 26.1% (± 0.96% SEM) N2 sleep, and 20.5% (± 0.88% SEM) REM sleep.…”
Section: Sleep Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%