2021
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was initially established by Evans by measuring ventricular size in pediatric patients, with an EI >0.3 indicating ventricular enlargement 1 . Actually, the measurement of EI is affected by different imaging planes and angles 8 . However, under consistent measurement methods and imaging protocols, EI measurements are not only simple and rapid but also highly reproducible 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was initially established by Evans by measuring ventricular size in pediatric patients, with an EI >0.3 indicating ventricular enlargement 1 . Actually, the measurement of EI is affected by different imaging planes and angles 8 . However, under consistent measurement methods and imaging protocols, EI measurements are not only simple and rapid but also highly reproducible 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Actually, the measurement of EI is affected by different imaging planes and angles. 8 However, under consistent measurement methods and imaging protocols, EI measurements are not only simple and rapid but also highly reproducible. 9 In this study, CS is more frequently seen in males, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, there is currently no unified standard to specify which plane and angle should be used for standardized EI measurements. The comparison of EI results using different planes and angles can lead to differences, which may be due to the different measurement methods rather than changes in the ventricle (Ryska et al, 2021 ). Therefore, standardized and unified imaging planes and angles are very important for the measurement of EI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ryska et al reported that the measurements of EI, CA, and other imaging markers will deviate with different angles or scanning sequence parameters, and this deviation often occurs in different centers. Therefore, a more standard and unified definition of the imaging plane or development of a computer-assisted system is warranted in the future [ 24 ]. In addition, a more important reason may be the sample bias caused by the different etiology of NPH in different regions of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%