2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-015-1108-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of laboratory parameters is associated with frailty markers and predicts non-cardiac mortality in hemodialysis patients

Abstract: The variability of several blood parameters had a significant impact on all-cause and non-cardiac mortality. The levels of the variabilities were most likely related to poor physical conditions of the patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
27
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with previous studies on the value of SNa and its changes as a predictor of outcome by Nakazato et al [8] and is also in line with previous published literature that showed variability of SNa to reflect impaired mobility, and associate with older age, anemia, hypoalbuminemia and hyponatremia per se [1,7,8,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This agrees with previous studies on the value of SNa and its changes as a predictor of outcome by Nakazato et al [8] and is also in line with previous published literature that showed variability of SNa to reflect impaired mobility, and associate with older age, anemia, hypoalbuminemia and hyponatremia per se [1,7,8,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The prognostic value of variability of clinical and laboratory markers such as blood pressure and hemoglobin has been investigated and established in the dialysis population [8,[14][15][16][23][24][25][26]. However, to the best of our knowledge the variability of SNa and its relationship to outcomes including the comparison of various metrics of variability is novel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or % ( n ) unless otherwise noted . Differences between the two groups were examined using a Student's t ‐test or χ 2 ‐test where appropriate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%