2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000160027.52481.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Extraarticular Tibial Rotation References for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
163
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
163
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Akagi et al [22] reported that the anteroposterior axis was more reliably identified on CT images than the TMA, whereas other authors found their results for this axis to be more consistent when using particular methods, such as those involving osteometric apparatus (24 AE 9.3 ) [3] or CT-based scanning (28 AE 10.0 ) [23], and these findings are similar to our own results (Table I). However, Eckhoff et al found that, when using the TMA to measure tibial torsion, it showed less variation, ranging from 15 to 30 [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Akagi et al [22] reported that the anteroposterior axis was more reliably identified on CT images than the TMA, whereas other authors found their results for this axis to be more consistent when using particular methods, such as those involving osteometric apparatus (24 AE 9.3 ) [3] or CT-based scanning (28 AE 10.0 ) [23], and these findings are similar to our own results (Table I). However, Eckhoff et al found that, when using the TMA to measure tibial torsion, it showed less variation, ranging from 15 to 30 [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This large variation among specimens agrees with what other researchers have noted regarding tibial rotational alignment. Akagi et al [1] found the angle between the TEA and the transmalleolar axis ranged from 8°to 49.4°. Similarly, Matziolis et al [33] found the angle between the TEA and an axis that aligned to the midpoint point of the tibial tubercle ranged from 0.7°to 43.4°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many anatomic landmarks are used to align the tibial component, including the projected femoral TEA [1,2,20,24], medial border of the tibial tubercle [17,18,22,47], medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle [17,20,47], PCL attachment [1,2,23,47], transverse axis of the tibia [18,20,47], posterior condylar line of the tibia [18,20,23], midsulcus of the tibial spine [17], malleolar axis [1,18], patellar tendon [1,2,23,24], and axis of the second metatarsal [1]. This lack of a gold standard for tibial component alignment, combined with the difficulty in identifying anatomic landmarks during surgery and variations in anatomy between knees, may lead to variations in the surgeons' ability to locate tibial component alignment axes as large as 44°internal rotation to 46°external rotation [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the tibial AP axis was drawn as a line connecting the middle of the PCL and the medial border of the patellar tendon at its attachment to the tibial tubercle [1,2]. After setting each reference point for these two axes, the tibia was verticalized along the TSA and frontalized along the tibial AP axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%