1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1989)115:1(82)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Empirical Flow Quantiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The daily E. coli concentrations were then used to construct an E. coli duration curve, similar to a flow duration curve (Loaiciga 1989). Daily E. coli concentration was ranked and the probability of exceedance (p) was calculated as:…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The daily E. coli concentrations were then used to construct an E. coli duration curve, similar to a flow duration curve (Loaiciga 1989). Daily E. coli concentration was ranked and the probability of exceedance (p) was calculated as:…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k is the rank of daily E. coli concentration and n is the number of days (Loaiciga 1989). The E. coli duration curve estimates the amount of time that BS was above an E. coli concentration threshold, such as the primary or secondary contact limits for the state of Arkansas.…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droughts were defined by at least 3 years of below-median annual streamflow in all or any subset of the basins. This particular definition of drought fits well with the water supply/demand situation in the study areas and with the hydrologic perspective of the study[Loaiciga, 1989]. Various other definitions of drought have been used with peculiarities depending on the meteorologic, climatic, ecologic, or economic emphasis given to drought phenomena.Figure 10displays the conceptual representation of drought as a stochastic process introduced by Loaiciga et al[1992].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 50, 75, 80, 90, and 100% exceedance‐probability streamflows (streamflow values that are equalled or exceeded, say 90% of the time) are calculated using the entire daily‐streamflow record for each streamgage (Searcy, 1959). The daily‐streamflow values are ranked from largest to smallest and a probability is calculated for each value based on the California‐plotting position (Loaiciga, 1989). The probabilities are insensitive to the choice of plotting position due to the large number of daily‐streamflow values in each record, so we do not consider other plotting positions.…”
Section: Data and Synthetic Partial‐record Measurement Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circles represent the 1120 continuous streamgages used in this study. Black is for the streamgages in the east region, blue for the central region, and red for the west region of the United States from largest to smallest and a probability is calculated for each value based on the California-plotting position (Loaiciga, 1989). The probabilities are insensitive to the choice of plotting position due to the large number of daily-streamflow values in each record, so we do not consider other plotting positions.…”
Section: Data and Synthetic Partial-record Measurement Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%