1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(07)80110-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of different methods for measurement of ECG intervals and ECG interval temporal variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values for QRS duration, PQ interval, and QT interval used for final data analysis were determined from the ECG, using a weighted mean for the 10 recorded leads. This method of analysis produces values for P-wave and QRS duration and amplitude and QT-interval duration identical to those obtained by cardiologists, 32 with a smaller coefficient of variation for repeated measures, particularly the QRS duration. 32,33 Therefore, the analysis procedure was the most appropriate method for detecting small changes in QRS duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Values for QRS duration, PQ interval, and QT interval used for final data analysis were determined from the ECG, using a weighted mean for the 10 recorded leads. This method of analysis produces values for P-wave and QRS duration and amplitude and QT-interval duration identical to those obtained by cardiologists, 32 with a smaller coefficient of variation for repeated measures, particularly the QRS duration. 32,33 Therefore, the analysis procedure was the most appropriate method for detecting small changes in QRS duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Automated analysis produces values for P wave and QRS durations and amplitudes and QT interval duration in humans that are identical to those obtained by cardiologists, 31 with a smaller coefficient of variation for repeated measures. 31,34 We observed that lead II QRS duration was 4 ms longer when dogs were standing, compared with right lateral recumbency, and that lead II QRS duration was increased in recordings with ECG quality scores of 2 and 3. These results were most likely related to the higher incidence of muscle artefacts in the ECG recordings from standing dogs, with the ECG analysis software program incorrectly identifying an earlier or later time for the start and end of ventricular depolarisation, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A notch filter to minimise AC interference was not used. 31 QRS duration was measured from its onset to the ST-segment onset (J point). 10 When directed, the ECG unit recorded and stored, in digitised form at 500 Hz with 16-bit precision (Pagewriter Xli M1700 cardiograph software, Hewlett-Packard Medical Products Group), the signals from leads I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V4 and V10 obtained throughout a 10-s period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations