2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of carbon content in mangrove species: Effect of species, compartments and tidal frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To transform biomass into carbon, the specific carbon contents found by Rodrigues et al (2014) were applied: 42.6% for L. racemosa and A. schaueriana and 40% for R. mangle. Because the three species occur in Guaratiba's fringe forests, it was necessary to apply the weighting method of the carbon content, considering the relative dominance of each species in terms of basal area as described by Rodrigues et al (2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To transform biomass into carbon, the specific carbon contents found by Rodrigues et al (2014) were applied: 42.6% for L. racemosa and A. schaueriana and 40% for R. mangle. Because the three species occur in Guaratiba's fringe forests, it was necessary to apply the weighting method of the carbon content, considering the relative dominance of each species in terms of basal area as described by Rodrigues et al (2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the three species occur in Guaratiba's fringe forests, it was necessary to apply the weighting method of the carbon content, considering the relative dominance of each species in terms of basal area as described by Rodrigues et al (2014). To compare the results of this study to the literature that present only belowground or aboveground biomass, biomass was converted into carbon stock.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the default value of 50 % as biomass C con-version factor which ignores the variation of C content may lead to biases (Zhang et al, 2009;Martin and Thomas, 2011;Rodrigues et al, 2015). For example, a change of 1 % wood C content from the canonical value of 50 % can bring up to ∼ 7 Pg C variation in global vegetation C stocks, which is almost equivalent to half of the vegetation C stocks of the continental United States (Dixon et al, 1994;Jones and O'Hara, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the uncertainty in estimation of vegetation C stocks, several studies have used the species-specific organ C content at regional scales (Jones and O'Hara, 2012;Rodrigues et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2017). Basically, the weighted mean C content (WMCC) of plants, especially woody plants, was useful for precise C stock estimation (Zhang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have noted the point that geomorphic condition is often qualitatively defined, and have recently sought to institute ecologically-derived classifications of geomorphic condition for mangroves globally [51]. It is possible that other indicators of tidal position (e.g., Euclidean distance from shoreline or soil salinity) would correlate better to SOC, as spatial variation in vegetation and ecosystem C stocks has been noted well within the literature [29, 36, 37, 52]. However, distance from shoreline and soil salinity are not consistently reported within the academic literature, and thus we did not incorporate them into the models of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%