2015
DOI: 10.1002/we.1833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of breaking wave characteristics and impact loads on offshore wind turbines supported by monopiles

Abstract: Hallowell et al. (2016) 1 was published with an error. The first sentence of the second paragraph of the Introduction states:"Of the 318 GW of worldwide offshore wind capacity installed as of 2014, 63% is located in shallow water (water depth < 30 m), where, all else being equal, OWTs can be installed less expensively 7 ."The number given is the worldwide onshore wind capacity, not the worldwide offshore wind capacity. The sentence should have read:"Of the almost 10 GW of worldwide offshore wind capacity insta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of both approaches is evaluated using the data collected from a Vestas V66 2‐MW OWT structure located approximately 1 km from the coast of Blyth, northeast of England (Figure 1a). The average water depth is approximately 9 m, the hub height is 67.8 m above the mudline, and the blade diameter is 66 m. The OWT was instrumented with eight strain gauges at four levels between mean sea level (MSL) and mudline as shown in Figure 1b 31 . The strain gauges were calibrated using cable‐pull procedure 24 to measure the section bending moments in both side‐to‐side ( x ) and fore–aft ( y ) directions with sampling rate of 40 Hz 24 .…”
Section: Case Study Structure: a 2‐mw Owtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of both approaches is evaluated using the data collected from a Vestas V66 2‐MW OWT structure located approximately 1 km from the coast of Blyth, northeast of England (Figure 1a). The average water depth is approximately 9 m, the hub height is 67.8 m above the mudline, and the blade diameter is 66 m. The OWT was instrumented with eight strain gauges at four levels between mean sea level (MSL) and mudline as shown in Figure 1b 31 . The strain gauges were calibrated using cable‐pull procedure 24 to measure the section bending moments in both side‐to‐side ( x ) and fore–aft ( y ) directions with sampling rate of 40 Hz 24 .…”
Section: Case Study Structure: a 2‐mw Owtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slamming loads on cylinders can be predicted by a number of engineering models [3,4]. However, comparisons with experimental results [5] show that these models are quite sensitive on the modelling assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing wind farms and wind farms under development are located in shallow water, characterized by a water depth less than 30 m. For these wind farms, the water depth is such that breaking or near-breaking waves will occur. Breaking waves occur when a wave becomes so steep that it becomes unstable, causing potentially large lateral forces on the offshore wind turbine (OWT), which, in some cases, can determine the design of the support structure [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%