2011
DOI: 10.1177/0885066610396993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in the Determination of Death After Cardiac Arrest

Abstract: This review is the first to document the variability of guidelines and statements for the determination of death after cardiac arrest, in countries where the practice of DCDD is becoming increasingly common. The scarcity of peer-reviewed published guidelines in the medical literature exemplifies the need for further investigation. We believe these results will inform the ethical discussions surrounding the determination of death after cardiac arrest. Clear and consistent guidelines based on evidence are needed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
62
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Determination of death varies in the different protocols, but also between ICUs. There is a lack of uniformity [19-21]. This includes the definition of death, the tests used to determine death and the period of time between death and the moment organs can be procured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determination of death varies in the different protocols, but also between ICUs. There is a lack of uniformity [19-21]. This includes the definition of death, the tests used to determine death and the period of time between death and the moment organs can be procured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the expansion of DCD programs, the lack of consensus about determination of death is a point of discussion and concern [22-24]. It is important to have clear, uniform and consistent evidence-based guidelines to determine death, in order to fulfill medical, ethical and legal obligations and to ensure public trust [19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International practice varies with regard to this time interval between C-1 and C-2. The most common waiting period is 5 min with a range from 2 to 10 min [18]. The participants came to consensus on the ‘minimum acceptable clinical standards’ to test for the cessation of circulatory function (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a majority of DCDD protocols, a stand-off period of 5 min is used, but the stand-off period varies between 2 and 20 min depending on the DCDD protocol 12. Because the heart is sensitive to WIT, a reduced stand-off period was used in the heart DCDD protocols of Denver (75 s and 3 min)2 and Sydney (2 min for two donors) 3…”
Section: Medical Considerations—description Of Heart Dcdd Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, ICU physicians declare death after 2–10 min of cessation of cardiocirculatory functions,12 and thus long before the point at which the function of all bodily cells has ceased. This criterion of death is unnecessarily conservative, is incompatible with usual medical practice and eliminates all organ transplantation 13…”
Section: Analysis Of the Dead Donor Rule In Heart Dcddmentioning
confidence: 99%