2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in results from predicted resting energy needs as compared to measured resting energy expenditure in Korean children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the Maffeis equation provided the higher accuracy in the non-obese group (accurate prediction: 68%, bias: 1.9%, RMSPE: 107.7 kcal/d) than in the obese group of our study. Lawrence et al [19] elucidated that REE predicted by the Maffeis equation was not significantly different with REE measured for Korean children with normal weight. These results showed that the Maffeis equation was good for the non-obese Korean children and adolescents only, not for the obese group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the Maffeis equation provided the higher accuracy in the non-obese group (accurate prediction: 68%, bias: 1.9%, RMSPE: 107.7 kcal/d) than in the obese group of our study. Lawrence et al [19] elucidated that REE predicted by the Maffeis equation was not significantly different with REE measured for Korean children with normal weight. These results showed that the Maffeis equation was good for the non-obese Korean children and adolescents only, not for the obese group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kim (W) and the Liu equations were selected for use to account for the ethnic differences of REE. The Kim (W) equation was developed from 92 Korean children, aged from 4 to 11 years [19], and the Liu equation was generated from 119 Chinese adults whose ages ranged from 20 to 78 years old [13]. Previous study concluded that FFM (fat-free mass)-based equations did not improve the REE prediction in 121 Dutch obese adolescents [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAO/WHO/UNU and Schofield equations were developed from predominantly normal-weight samples. The Harris-Benedict equation was also included because it was the most widely used of the earlier studies [ 14 ]. Cunningham equation based on measurement of fat-free mass as an independent variable was selected, along with De Lorenzo and Park's equations were developed for athletes [ 15 18 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunningham's equation was not developed for an athletic population, but rather for healthy untrained adult subjects. In addition, Harris-Benedict's and Cunningham's formulas were developed in 1918 and 1980, respectively [ 9 14 ]. Over the years, many prediction equations have become available, some of which might be regarded as more appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lawrence et al ( 13 ) designed several REE prediction equation models, known as Kim's equations, in 2009. They studied a sample size of 92 apparently healthy preschool children and third and fifth graders (38 boys and 54 girls) aged 4–11 years from a rural area of South Korea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%