2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in Physical Inactivity Responses of University Students during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Monitoring of Daily Step Counts Using a Smartphone Application

Abstract: This study investigated the changes in physical inactivity of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic, with reference to their academic calendar. We used the daily step counts recorded by a smartphone application (iPhone Health App) from April 2020 to January 2021 (287 days) for 603 participants. The data for 287 days were divided into five periods based on their academic calendar. The median value of daily step counts across each period was calculated. A k-means clustering analysis was performed to c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data showed a significant reduction in daily step counts during the first pandemic year, followed by an increase in the second pandemic year. This finding suggests that the pandemic had a negative impact on physical activity levels among university students, which is consistent with previous studies conducted among general populations around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 17 , 23 , 26 35 ]. This indicates that the pandemic preventive measures have completely changed the university students’ lifestyle, especially for teaching activities that have been turned to be delivered in digital form with extreme restrictions related to any campus activity [ 26 – 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our data showed a significant reduction in daily step counts during the first pandemic year, followed by an increase in the second pandemic year. This finding suggests that the pandemic had a negative impact on physical activity levels among university students, which is consistent with previous studies conducted among general populations around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 17 , 23 , 26 35 ]. This indicates that the pandemic preventive measures have completely changed the university students’ lifestyle, especially for teaching activities that have been turned to be delivered in digital form with extreme restrictions related to any campus activity [ 26 – 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our dataset, 19,083 apps had descriptions written in a non-English language. The language of each app description was detected using the langdetect package of python 4 . In our dataset, 44 languages were detected other than English, which included Spanish (3590 apps), German (2346 apps), Italian (2298 apps), Portuguese (2280 apps), French (1448), Dutch (1056), Japanese (908), and Russian (894).…”
Section: Text Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Collective trauma is defined as a significant event that negatively affects the population. 2 The pandemic declined people's physical activity as observed by Janovský et al 3 and Konda et al 4 Specifically, the pandemic hampered fitness activities in gyms and encouraged people to explore alternate fitness activities such as workouts at home, yoga, and meditation, as Kaur et al 5 discussed. Technology has played a pivotal role in maintaining H-F activities during the pandemic through mHealth (mobile health) and mobile apps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, smartphone technology (mobile health apps) monitoring health-related physical activity status has always been classi ed as a valid and reliable methodology, especially among adults during the pandemic [18]. These apps, as a tool for electronic surveys, can guarantee a signi cant sample for screening studies, primarily when it's used to monitor daily step counts among different countries and populations [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%