The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70222-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abstract: A high degree of precision is possible in CT measurement of AAA diameter, but this precision may not be obtained in practice because of differences in measurement techniques. Differences between imaging modalities increase variability further. Variations in AAA measurement of 0.5 cm or more are not uncommon, and this should be taken into account in management decisions. Efforts to reduce variation in measurement are warranted and might include (1) seeking agreement between surgeons and radiologists on a precis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
99
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that CT measurements of aneurysm size tend to be larger than ultrasound measurements by a mean of 3 to 9 mm, according to the aneurysm size. 41,42 CT angiography (3-dimensional display of the aorta and its branches) is particularly useful, in that it provides more comprehensive evaluation of the anatomy of both the abdominal aortic aneurysm and the renal, mesenteric, and iliac arteries ( Figure 11). In those in whom contrast-enhanced CT scanning is contraindicated (eg, renal insufficiency or allergy), MR angiography is an alternative for the comprehensive evaluation of aortic aneurysms.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that CT measurements of aneurysm size tend to be larger than ultrasound measurements by a mean of 3 to 9 mm, according to the aneurysm size. 41,42 CT angiography (3-dimensional display of the aorta and its branches) is particularly useful, in that it provides more comprehensive evaluation of the anatomy of both the abdominal aortic aneurysm and the renal, mesenteric, and iliac arteries ( Figure 11). In those in whom contrast-enhanced CT scanning is contraindicated (eg, renal insufficiency or allergy), MR angiography is an alternative for the comprehensive evaluation of aortic aneurysms.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Additionally, USV is convenient, noninvasive, inexpensive and portable, does not involve radiation exposure and does not need contrast. However, there is a relatively higher rate of interobserver and intraobserver variability with ultrasonography than with angiotomography, 18 but this variability is no larger than 4 mm, on average. 19 Additionally, ultrasonography is also able to provide a better approximation to the true perpendicular diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, since it is not affected by the angle of the aorta, which impacts on tomography results at angles greater than 25°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the results of Destrade et al [14] (see also Chadwick [15]), we find that the incremental equations of motion can be written as a first-order differential system of six equations, namely 17) where the notation ξ is defined by 18) and the 6 × 6 matrix N has the block structure 19) in which the 3×3 matrices N 1 , N 2 , N 3 are real and their components depend on the material parameters γ ij and β ij given in (2.13), and the notation ρ = ρω 2 /k 2 has been introduced. Here I represents the 3 × 3 identity matrix.…”
Section: The Pre-stressed Elastic Half-spacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Its accuracy is as good as that of computed tomography (CT) scans and it has obvious non-radiative advantages [19], [20], [21]. We now apply the results of this section to an IVUS context.…”
Section: Application: Modelling Of Intravascular Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 96%