2015
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in young athletes: an unrecognized obstacle for electrocardiogram-based screening protocols

Abstract: Seattle criteria reduced the number of abnormal ECGs in athletes and increased agreement in classification. However, variability in ECG interpretation by cardiologists and sport physicians remains high and is a limitation for ECG-based screening programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berte et al 14 suggested there is a discrepancy between ECG interpretation accuracy between sports medicine physicians and cardiologists. Among cardiologists, Dhutia et al 15 found that both ECG interpretation accuracy and the choice of further investigations were heavily physician dependent, with those experienced in athlete screening performing better than their inexperienced colleagues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berte et al 14 suggested there is a discrepancy between ECG interpretation accuracy between sports medicine physicians and cardiologists. Among cardiologists, Dhutia et al 15 found that both ECG interpretation accuracy and the choice of further investigations were heavily physician dependent, with those experienced in athlete screening performing better than their inexperienced colleagues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As above, while sensitivity and specificity of the ECG are imperfect, both are likely better with the ECG. Quality control is another issue, but while there are difficulties with quality control both with obtaining the ECG, and with physician interpretation,30 H&P performance also falls short 31. Initiatives to train physicians in the preparticipation H&P, such as now required in some US states, are an important endeavour.…”
Section: Preparticipation Cardiac Screening In Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cardiovascular screening has been adopted as public policy and met with widespread acceptance in some countries, 49,88,129 practical concerns have limited enthusiasm for mandated screening in the US and elsewhere. 130 Chief among these are 1) the impact of false-positive findings, which include unnecessary work-up, proscription from sport or other desired, healthful or necessary activity, and possible creation of psychological harms, 115,116 2) the effect of inaccuracy in diagnosis to discount the potential value of cardiovascular screening in actual use [131][132][133] , and 3) the willingness of patients with positive screening tests to pursue further diagnosis and management. 114 Effective yield of screening tests can be increased by limiting testing to relatives of disease probands.…”
Section: Identification Of Young Patients At Risk For Scd Prodromal Smentioning
confidence: 99%