2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02691309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in habitat use by young-of-the-year winter flounder,Pseudopleuronectes americanus, in three northeastern U.S. estuaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because estuarine systems are so dynamic, it can be difficult to isolate single variables. Young winter flounder are strongly associated with specific habitats (Goldberg et al 2002;Lazzari 2008;Meng et al 2002;Meng et al 2005). In Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, winter flounder abundance was higher in coves, all sites with marsh or beach edges, and where human disturbances occurred (Meng et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because estuarine systems are so dynamic, it can be difficult to isolate single variables. Young winter flounder are strongly associated with specific habitats (Goldberg et al 2002;Lazzari 2008;Meng et al 2002;Meng et al 2005). In Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, winter flounder abundance was higher in coves, all sites with marsh or beach edges, and where human disturbances occurred (Meng et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similarly, abundance patterns of fishes in Bonaire were strongly affected by location, water transparency, amount of physical exposure and the structural complexity of the biotope, particularly in mangroves and seagrasses (Nagelkerken et al 2000). Recent investigations in 5 different bottom types in each of 3 estuaries in New Jersey and Connecticut revealed that patterns of abundance (Goldberg et al 2002) and growth in juvenile winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus were not predictable on the basis of nominal habitat type, and differences among the habitats were not consistent across the estuaries or over 2 yr. Others have reported variation in fauna asso-ciated with salt marshes related to elevation, extent of inundation and proximity to open water and other habitats (Rozas & Reed 1993, McIvor & Rozas 1996, Irlandi & Crawford 1997, Minello & Webb 1997, Kneib 2000. It is clear that hydrographic and landscape context has a large influence on habitat associations (Irlandi et al 1995, Peterson et al 2001, Minello & Rozas 2002), perhaps as much as the substratum itself.…”
Section: Habitat Form Vs Habitat Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These habitats are often particular sediments (Gibson & Robb 1992, Stoner & Ottmar 2003 or a combination of sediment and other habitat characteristics (e.g. emergent structures, depth, temperature; Pihl & van der Veer 1992, Jager et al 1993, Abookire & Norcross 1998, Phelan et al 2001, Goldberg et al 2002. More importantly in the context of DDHS, these preferred habitats are constantly in a dynamic state of flux ) such that their availability may be high in one year and almost absent in another (A. W. Stoner unpubl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%