Rehabilitation and Chronic Care 2018
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.oa5201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in access and referral to pulmonary rehabilitation in European bronchiectasis patients enrolled in the EMBARC registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this year's Congress, several large real-life cohort studies were presented using data from EMBARC, a prospective dataset of more than 11 000 patients from more than 27 European countries. Marked heterogeneity in patient characteristics, management and outcomes were noted across different European countries, with significantly worse QoL, faster lung function decline and higher exacerbation frequency noted in Eastern Europe versus Western Europe, together with a significant between-country variability in access and referral to pulmonary rehabilitation [ 54 , 55 ]. Classification of patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), conditions deserving of disease-specific guidelines outside of bronchiectasis, showed older age, female sex, higher MRC dyspnoea scores and bilateral involvement of the middle lobe and lingua to be independently associated with the development of NTM in bronchiectasis, whilst PCD patients were typically younger at presentation with increased disease severity compared to age and sex-matched patients with idiopathic disease or bronchiectasis secondary to immune deficiency [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Bronchiectasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this year's Congress, several large real-life cohort studies were presented using data from EMBARC, a prospective dataset of more than 11 000 patients from more than 27 European countries. Marked heterogeneity in patient characteristics, management and outcomes were noted across different European countries, with significantly worse QoL, faster lung function decline and higher exacerbation frequency noted in Eastern Europe versus Western Europe, together with a significant between-country variability in access and referral to pulmonary rehabilitation [ 54 , 55 ]. Classification of patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), conditions deserving of disease-specific guidelines outside of bronchiectasis, showed older age, female sex, higher MRC dyspnoea scores and bilateral involvement of the middle lobe and lingua to be independently associated with the development of NTM in bronchiectasis, whilst PCD patients were typically younger at presentation with increased disease severity compared to age and sex-matched patients with idiopathic disease or bronchiectasis secondary to immune deficiency [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Bronchiectasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,15 However, in practise many patients with bronchiectasis have been found not to participate in PR. [15][16][17][18] A 2015 Cochrane review reported low adherence to advised management strategies, including exercise, in patients with bronchiectasis, and a link between poor adherence and negative health outcomes. 16 The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) found experts and patients concurred that establishing accessible methods and increasing adherence to PR are priorities for research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 , 15 However, in practise many patients with bronchiectasis have been found not to participate in PR. 15 18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary data show that access to airway clearance techniques and pulmonary rehabilitation is highly variable in patients with bronchiectasis across Europe [35,36]. Bronchiectasis audits have also shown that implementation of the guidelines can be limited and even adherence to national standards of patient care is variable [37][38][39][40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%