2009 10th International Symposium on Quality of Electronic Design 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isqed.2009.4810353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability aware modeling of SoCs: From device variations to manufactured system yield

Abstract: As CMOS technology feature sizes decrease, random within-die and inter-die process variations more and more jeopardizeSoCparametricandfunctionalyield.Largely neglectedintheState-Of-the-Art,dynamicenergyconsumption and power dissipation becomes heavily affected. This paper describes a technique to systematically bring statistically correlated timing/energy variations all the way up from the device to the SoC level. We propose a flow for Variability Aware Modeling (VAM) and apply it to a case study using a indus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From costly Monte Carlo analysis to probabilistic methods, these techniques are usually focused on improving timing yield at circuit level, where variations can cause up to 30% of mismatch in chip frequency [Agarwal et al 2003;Forzan and Pandini 2009]. Other techniques based also on statistical characterization can be found in [Miranda et al 2009]. Most of the work done in statistical analysis assumes that key parameters affected by variability, such as the threshold voltage or the effective channel length, follow a multivariate normal distribution [Herbert and Marculescu 2009].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From costly Monte Carlo analysis to probabilistic methods, these techniques are usually focused on improving timing yield at circuit level, where variations can cause up to 30% of mismatch in chip frequency [Agarwal et al 2003;Forzan and Pandini 2009]. Other techniques based also on statistical characterization can be found in [Miranda et al 2009]. Most of the work done in statistical analysis assumes that key parameters affected by variability, such as the threshold voltage or the effective channel length, follow a multivariate normal distribution [Herbert and Marculescu 2009].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this variation, we assumed a standard deviation of 3.3% (3蟽 = 10%) for all three resources. These numbers are selected as they agree with the data on process variation in current technology nodes [5]. To obtain the set of possible operating points, we discretized the FMAX probability distribution function (PDF) of each resource into 5 discrete points.…”
Section: A Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, known as process variation [1], [2], significantly impacts the maximum supported frequency of individual cores in a MPSoC [3], [4]. It is shown in [5] that the variation in the longest path delay (the inverse of FMAX) of a Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW) processor, manufactured at 32nm technology, is up to 40%. Moreover, the impact of within-die variation on the system parameters is increasing as the technology scales, making it a limiting factor in efficient MPSoC design [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generic analytical approach to predict the statistics of a system from the given Probability Density Function (PDF) of its sub-system components appeared in [9], and particularly for memories in [10]. However, both methods fail to accurately capture all the interactions between the different memory islands.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%