2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability and task-responsiveness of electrophysiological dynamics: Scale-free stability and oscillatory flexibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the PLE, ACW and MF remained relatively stable in their closeness and strength while SE and LZC showed stronger changes. That does not only compare well with the core-periphery organization on a dynamic level but also with the recently supposed distinction of stable background dynamic measures and more flexible foreground dynamic measures [82].…”
Section: Relationship Between Different Measures Is Hierarchical and ...supporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, the PLE, ACW and MF remained relatively stable in their closeness and strength while SE and LZC showed stronger changes. That does not only compare well with the core-periphery organization on a dynamic level but also with the recently supposed distinction of stable background dynamic measures and more flexible foreground dynamic measures [82].…”
Section: Relationship Between Different Measures Is Hierarchical and ...supporting
confidence: 70%
“…This indicates that different regions are defined by their temporal structure in the way they respond to external perturbations. LZC and SE on the other hand are more task and layer unspecific, thus, more malleable measures for external perturbation, further their role as foreground measures [82].…”
Section: Task-specific and -Unspecific Effects In Both Topography And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IRASA method (Wen & Liu, 2016 ) was applied to separate oscillatory and fractal components of the power spectrum and previously successfully in EEG/MEG (Wainio‐Theberge et al, 2021 ; Wainio‐Theberge et al, 2022 ). The comparison between the conventionally computed PLE presented above, including both fractal and oscillatory components in the power spectrum, and the IRASA method obtained fractal‐based PLE values (exclusion of oscillatory components) for the SCP and JCP ROIs in rest and task states are displayed in Figure 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To discard the possibility of the oscillatory component of the power spectrum driving our results, we used irregular‐resampling auto‐spectral analysis (IRASA) method to separate fractal component from oscillatory component (Muthukumaraswamy & Liley, 2018; Wainio‐Theberge et al, 2021; Wainio‐Theberge et al, 2022; Wen & Liu, 2016). Briefly, the signal is resampled with a factor h ranging from 1.1 to 1.9 with steps of 0.05; and 1h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%