2019
DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability and Central Tendencies in Speech Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These distributions were characterized by their location (centroid) and spread parameters, the latter in the form of a 2 × 2 covariance matrix, which accounts for both spread and correlation between F1 and F2 values. This level of description amounts to assuming that formant values within each vowel category are distributed as two-dimensional Gaussians, a fairly common assumption in the literature ( Whalen & Chen, 2019 ). We then computed the MD between each token of a given vowel category produced by the mobile speakers and the corresponding reference (sedentary) distribution using formula B1 in Appendix B .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These distributions were characterized by their location (centroid) and spread parameters, the latter in the form of a 2 × 2 covariance matrix, which accounts for both spread and correlation between F1 and F2 values. This level of description amounts to assuming that formant values within each vowel category are distributed as two-dimensional Gaussians, a fairly common assumption in the literature ( Whalen & Chen, 2019 ). We then computed the MD between each token of a given vowel category produced by the mobile speakers and the corresponding reference (sedentary) distribution using formula B1 in Appendix B .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing an adequate number of Gaussians, varying their means, covariance, and weights makes it possible to approximate any continuous density to a random accuracy. It is the most frequently used distribution system for modeling speaker and gender features in person and GR systems because speech features are usually assumed to be normally distributed 51 . The ease of learning ability, boot strapping from flat data faster computation, and compatibility with frame‐level features makes it a choice modeling tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the most frequently used distribution system for modeling speaker and gender features in person and GR systems because speech features are usually assumed to be normally distributed. 51 The ease of learning ability, boot strapping from flat data faster computation, and compatibility with frame-level features makes it a choice modeling tool. GMM has also been proven to be very efficient and effective in text-independent classification system where the prior knowledge of what the speaker will say next is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daria D'Alessandro, Cécile Fougeron CNRS, Grenoble, France University of Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France Premising that it is planned, anticipatory Vowel-to-Vowel coarticulation provides a cue on the size of the encoded speech units, since it reflects the coordination of elements that are planned together in the same unit (e.g. Whalen & Chen, 2019). Several studies have shown that coarticulation varies, e.g., according to speakers (Zellou, 2017), age (D'Alessandro & Fougeron, 2021), rate (Matthies et al, 2001), style (Scarborough & Zellou, 2013).…”
Section: Variability In Anticipatory V-to-v Coarticulation In Frenchmentioning
confidence: 99%